- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Rhacophorus reinwardtii (Schlegel, 1840)
Rhacophorus moschatus Kuhl and Van Hasselt, 1822, Algemeene Konst-en Letter-Bode, 7: 104. Types: Not stated, although presumably RMNH. Type locality: Mount Pangerango, Java, Indonesia. Synonymy by Brongersma, 1942, Arch. Neerland. Zool., 6: 341–346; and Dubois, 1989 "1988", Alytes, 7: 101, who has appealed to the ICZN to suppress this senior synonym. Ohler and Dubois, 2006, Alytes, 23: 123–132, argued that the name is a nomen oblitum under Art. 23.9 of the Code (1999).
Rhacophorus reinwardtii Kuhl and Van Hasselt, 1822, Algemeene Konst-en Letter-Bode, 7: 104 (nomen nudum); Tschudi, 1838, Classif. Batr.: 32, 73 (nomen nudum).
Racophorus reinwardtii Schlegel, 1826, Bull. Sci. Nat. Geol., Paris, Ser. 2, 9: 239. Nomen nudum.
Hypsiboas reinwardtii Wagler, 1830, Nat. Syst. Amph.: 200. Type(s): RMNH. Type locality: Not provided. Nomen nudum.
Rhacophorus rheinwardtii — Tschudi, 1838, Classif. Batr.: 75. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Hyla reinwardtii Schlegel, 1840, Abbild. Neuer Unvollst. Amph., Atlas: pl. 30. Syntypes: Including animals figured on pl. 30 of original; including RMNH 1870 (2 specimens; Java), 6517 (2 specimens; Java), and 3899 (Sumatra), according to M.S. Hoogmoed In Inger, 1985, in Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 547. Ohler and Dubois, 2006, Alytes, 23: 123–132, suggested that only RMNH 6517A, 3899, and 1970A and not 1870B and 6517B were syntypes; they selected RMNH 6517A as the lectotype. Type locality: Not stated, but likely Java, Indonesia. See Dubois, 1989 "1988", Alytes, 7: 101–104, for clarification.
Rhacophorus reinwardti var. lateralis Werner, 1900, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 13: 495. Holotype: NHMB 1192 according to Forcart, 1946, Verh. Naturforsch. Ges. Basel, 57: 132. Type locality: "Laut Tador, Batu Bahra", Sumatra, Indonesia. Incorrect subsequent spelling of the species name.
Polypedates reinwardtii — Siedlecki, 1909, Biol. Zentralbl., 29: 704.
Rhacophorus reinwardtii — Van Kampen, 1910, Natuurkd. Tijdschr. Nederl. Indie, 69: 43.
Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) reinwardtii — Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 171; Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 77; Mahony, Kamei, Brown, and Chan, 2024, Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 74: 253, by implication.
Common Names
Reinwardti's Frog (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World: 170).
Reinwardt's Flying Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 114).
Reinwardt's Tree Frog (Das and Dutta, 1998, Hamadryad, 23: 67).
Reinwardt's Treefrog (Chan-ard, 2003, Photograph. Guide Amph. Thailand: 162).
Reinwardt's Gliding Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 134).
Green Flying-frog (Iskandar, 1998, Amph. Java Bali: 91).
Black-webbed Treefrog (Fei, 1999, Atlas Amph. China: 268).
Small Flying Tree Frog (Nutphund, 2001, Amph. Thailand: 146).
Distribution
Java (Indonesia); questionably from Manipur and Sikkim, northeastern India.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Indonesia
Likely/Controversially Present: India
Endemic: Indonesia
Comment
In the Rhacophorus (Rhacophorus) reinwardtii group of Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 77; see comment under Rhacophorus for dissenting opinion regarding the recognition of this group. See Berry, 1975, Amph. Fauna Peninsular Malaysia: 107, for account. Dubois, 1982, Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris, Sect. A, Zool., 4: 261–280, suggested that Rhacophorus moschatus Kuhl and Van Hasselt, 1822, is the name with priority for this species, but recommended the retention of reinwardtii for stability. Dubois also noted that Hypsiboas reinwardtii Wagler, 1830, is a nomen nudum. Ohler and Dubois, 2006, Alytes, 23: 123–132, discussed the nomenclature of this species, preserved the name Rhacophorus reinwardtii as a nomen protectum, and provided a description of the lectotype. See comment under Rhacophorus kio. The records from Laos by Stuart, 2005, Herpetol. Rev., 36: 479, were subsequently (i.e., Bain, Nguyen, and Doan, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 111) treated as Rhacophorus kio. Das and Dutta, 2007, Hamadryad, 31: 154–181, noted a number of larval descriptions in the literature. Devi and Shamungou, 2006, J. Exp. Zool. India, 9: 317–324, provided a questionable record for Manipur, northeastern India. Chan and Grismer, 2010, Zootaxa, 2505: 40–50, noted that records from peninsular Thailand and Malaya, and likely from Sumatra, are referable to Rhacophorus norhayatii. Matsui, Shimada, and Sudin, 2013, Curr. Herpetol., Kyoto, 32: 112–124, named Rhacophorus borneensis and implied that records of Rhacophorus reinwardtii from Borneo are applicable to the new species and that records of nominal Rhacophorus reinwardtii from China and Vietnam apply to unnamed species. Subba, Aravind, and Ravikanth, 2016, Check List, 13(1: 2033): 12, considered the presence of this species in Sikkim, India, to be doubtful. O'Connell, Hamidy, Kurniawan, Smith, and Fujita, 2018, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 123: 101–112, discussed molecular phylogeography regarding the population on java. See brief account for East Java by Amin, 2020, Frogs of East Java: 60–63.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.