Boana multifasciata (Günther, 1859)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Hylidae > Subfamily: Cophomantinae > Genus: Boana > Species: Boana multifasciata

Hyla multifasciata Günther, 1859 "1858", Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus.: 101. Holotype: BMNH 1947.2.23.6 (formerly 51.12.26.14) according to Condit, 1964, J. Ohio Herpetol. Soc., 4: 93. Type locality: "Para", Brazil; given as "Pará, provàvelmente Belém" by Bokermann, 1966, Lista Anot. Local. Tipo Anf. Brasil.: 56; stated as "Belém, Pará", Brazil, by Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 78.

Hyla albopunctata multifasciataRivero, 1961, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 126: 105.

Hyla multifasciataDuellman, 1974, Copeia, 1974: 286.

Hypsiboas multifasciatusFaivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 86.

Boana multifasciata — Dubois, 2017, Bionomina, 11: 28. 

English Names

Many-banded Treefrog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 56).

Distribution

Lowlands of eastern and southern Venezuela, through the Guianas to Ceará and Goiás, Rondônia and Pará, Brazil, limited by the Amazon, the Orinoco, and Rio Negro,  150 to 1400 m elevation. See comment. 

Comment

Resurrected from the synonymy of Hyla albopunctata by Duellman, 1974, Copeia, 1974: 286, where it had been placed by Rivero, 1961, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 126: 105 (who also provided an account). Reviewed by de Sá, 1996, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 624: 1-4. Duellman, 1974, Copeia, 1974: 286, noted that Lutz, 1973, Brazil. Spec. Hyla: 41, referred specimen of Hyla multifasciata to her Hyla daudini, which was coined as a replacement name for "Hyla boans Daudin". Duellman, 1997, Sci. Pap. Nat. Hist. Mus. Univ. Kansas, 2: 18–19, commented on a population in southern Venezuela. Lescure and Marty, 2000, Collect. Patrimoines Nat., Paris, 45: 112-113, provided a brief account and photo. See comments regarding distribution of Venezuelan population by Gorzula and Señaris, 1999 "1998", Scient. Guaianae, 8: 34-35. In the Hypsiboas albopunctatus group of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 86. Loebmann, Prado, Haddad, Bastos, and Guimarães, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 476, provided records from Ceará and Goiás, Brazil. See account for Surinam population by Ouboter and Jairam, 2012, Amph. Suriname: 154-155. See Cole, Townsend, Reynolds, MacCulloch, and Lathrop, 2013, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 125: 406-407, for brief account and records for Guyana. See Barrio-Amorós, Rojas-Runjaic, and Señaris, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (1: e180): 65, for comments on range, systematics, and literature. Señaris and Rojas-Runjaic, 2020, in Rull and Carnaval (eds.), Neotrop. Divers. Patterns Process.: 571–632, commented on range and conservation status in the Venezuelan Guayana. Fouquet, Marinho, Réjaud, Carvalho, Caminer, Jansen, Rainha, Rodrigues, Werneck, Lima, Hrbek, Giaretta, Venegas, Chávez, and Ron, 2021, Syst. Biodiversity, 19: Supplemental Appendix 5, suggested that populations in the Guiana Shield (their Boana aff. albopunctata 2, Pará, Brazil (their Boana aff. albopunctata 4), and Rondônia, Brazil (their Boana aff. albopunctata 1) belong to unnamed species.

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.