- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989
Eupsophus emiliopugini Formas, 1989, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 102: 568. Holotype: IZUA 1587, by original designation; destroyed by fire on 3 December 2007. Type locality: "La Picada, 23 km NE (by road) of Ensenada..., Osorno Province, Andean Range, 41°04′ S, 72°26′ W, 480 m.", Chile.
Common Names
Emilio's Ground Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 80).
Distribution
Known from the Región Lagos south through to the Región de Aysén (Puerto Yates, Isla Riveros, and including the islands of Chiloé, Kent, and Clemente), southern Chile, and Lago Puelo National Park, Chubut, Argentina.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Argentina, Chile
Comment
In the Eupsophus vertebralis group of Formas and Brieva, 1994, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 107: 391-397. Argentina record from Úbeda, Ramilo, Chehebar, and Vidoz, 1999, Herpetol. Rev., 30: 230. Díaz-Páez and Nuñez, 2002, Herpetol. Rev., 33: 220, provided additional records for Chile. Vera Candioti, Nuñez, and Úbeda, 2010, Acta Zool., Stockholm, 92: 27–45, described development, morphology, and anatomy of the tadpoles. Correa-Quezada and Durán, 2019, ZooKeys, 863: 107–152, discussed the species and noted that its mtDNA phylogeny is not exclusive with respect to Eupsophus vertebralis. Suárez-Villota, Quercia, and Nuñez, 2018, J. Genomics, 6: 98–102, reported on the mitochondrial genome. See Correa-Quezada and Durán, 2019, ZooKeys, 863: 107–152, for discussion of systematics and range. Raimilla and de la Harpe, 2019, Bol. Chil. Herpetol., 6: 59–63, reported localities on Clemente Island, National Reserve Las Guaitecas in the Aysen region, Chile. See Charrier, 2019, Anf. Bosques Centro Sur y Patagonia de Chile: 178–181, for account (morphology, habitat, natural history) and polygon distribution map. Quercia, Suárez-Villota, Foresti, and Nuñez, 2020, Comp. Cytogenet., 14: 61–74, discussed the comparative cytogenetics of this species and Eupsophus vertebralis.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.