- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Diasporus diastema (Cope, 1875)
Lithodytes diastema Cope, 1875 "1876", J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 8: 155. Syntypes: USNM 25170-71 according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 65; USNM 25170 designated lectotype by Dunn, 1942, Not. Nat., Philadelphia, 104: 2, who noted that USNM 25171 is a specimen of Eleutherodactylus ockendeni (= Eleutherodactylus taeniatus). Type locality: "Camp Mary Caretta, Panama".
Hylodes diastema — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 212.
Eleutherodactylus diastema — Stejneger, 1904, Annu. Rep. U.S. Natl. Mus. for 1902: 582-583, by implication; Barbour and Dunn, 1921, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 34: 161.
Hyla chica Noble, 1918, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 38: 335-339. Holotype: AMNH 8230, by original designation. Type locality: "near Bluefields, Nicaragua—Maselina Creek, two miles from mouth", Nicaragua. Synonymy by Dunn, 1931, Occas. Pap. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 5: 411; Dunn, 1942, Not. Nat., Philadelphia, 104: 2; Taylor, 1952, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 35: 701.
Syrrhopus ineptus Barbour, 1928, Proc. New England Zool. Club, 10: 25-26. Holotype: MCZ 13050, by original designation. Type locality: "Rio Chenillo, near Monte Lirio, Canal Zone of Panama". Synonymy by Dunn, 1931, Occas. Pap. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 5: 411; Dunn, 1942, Not. Nat., Philadelphia, 104: 2; Taylor, 1952, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 35: 701.
Eleutherodactylus (Eleutherodactylus) diastema — Lynch, 1996, in Powell and Henderson (eds.), Contr. W. Indian Herpetol.: 154; Lynch and Duellman, 1997, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 23: 223.
Pristimantis diastema — Heinicke, Duellman, and Hedges, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Suppl. Inform., 104: Table 2.
Diasporus diastema — Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008, Zootaxa, 1737: 47.
Common Names
Caretta Robber Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 74).
Distribution
Humid lowlands of eastern Honduras south through Central America to western Panama (see comment), sea level to 1620 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama
Comment
See comment under Eleutherodactylus moro. See account by Cochran and Goin, 1970, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 288: 422–424. Wilczynski and Brenowitz, 1988, Animal Behav., 36: 1054–1063, reported on vocalization. In the Eleutherodactylus (Eleutherodactylus) martinicensis series, Eleutherodactylus diastema group of Lynch and Duellman, 1997, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 23: 223. Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Lynch, 1996, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 20: 396, noted that Colombian records required confirmation, and Lynch, 2001, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 25: 287–297, found all of these records to be attributable to other species. Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 272–273, provided an account, noted that additional species might be found under this name, and placed this species in his Eleutherodactylus martinicensis series, Eleutherodactylus diastema group. McCranie, Nicholson, and Castañeda, 2002, Herpetol. Rev., 33: 220, reported the Honduras record and commented on the range. McCranie, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 38, summarized the departmental distribution in Honduras. Transferred to Diasporus by Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008, Zootaxa, 1737: 47, on the basis of molecular data. See comments by Sunyer, Páiz, Dehling, and Köhler, 2009, Herpetol. Notes, 2: 189–202, regarding Nicaraguan populations. Hertz, Hauenschild, Lotzkat, and Köhler, 2012, ZooKeys, 196: 23–46, suggested on the basis of molecular data that this nominal species is composed of at least three species (one of these from El Copé, Coclé, Panama), none of which are sister taxa. Jiménez-Rivillas, Vargas, Fang, Di Filippo, and Daza-R., 2013, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 8: 1–4, reported on aspects of the advertisement call. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 140–191, provided a key to the genera and species of Brachycephaloidea (= Craugastoridae, Eleutherodactylidae) in Central America and provided maps and photographs of the species, including this one.. Sunyer, Martínez-Fonseca, Salazar-Saavedra, Galindo-Uribe, and Obando, 2014, Mesoam. Herpetol., 1: 172, provided a record for the department of Chontales, Nicaragua. Batista, Köhler, Mebert, Hertz, and Veselý, 2016, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 178: 267–311, suggested at least three unnamed species, morphologically associated with this species in eastern Panama. Capshaw, Foss-Grant, Hartmann , Sehuanes, and Moss , 2020, Bioacoustics, 29: 79–96, discussed the advertisement call. Martínez-Fonseca, Holmes, Sunyer, Westeen, Grundler, Cerda, Fernández-Mena, Loza-Molina, Monagan, Nondorf, Pandelis, and Rabosky, 2024, Check List, 20: 70, provided and discussed a record from Refugio Bartola, Departamento Río San Juan, Nicaragua, 60 m elevation.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.