- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour, 1914
Eleutherodactylus johnstonei Barbour, 1914, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 44: 249. Syntypes: MCZ 2759 (2 specimens), by original designation. Type locality: "St. Georges, [St. George Parish,] Grenada".
Hylodes johnstonei — Nieden, 1923, Das Tierreich, 46: 421.
Hyla barbudensis Auffenberg, 1958, Q. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 21: 251. Holotype: UF 2752 (fossil ilium), by original designation. Type locality: "Cave I, Two Foot Bay, Barbuda, British Leeward Islands". Synonymy by Schwartz, 1967, Stud. Fauna Curaçao and other Caribb. Is., 24: 18–20.
Eleutherodactylus barbudensis — Lynch, 1966, Copeia, 1966: 525.
Eleutherodactylus johnstonii — Sutherland and Nunnemacher, 1981, J. Comp. Neurol., 202: 415–420. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Eleutherodactylus (Eleutherodactylus) johnstonei — Hedges, 1989, in Woods (ed.), Biogeograph. W. Indies: 327; Heinicke, Duellman, and Hedges, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Suppl. Inform., 104: 9.
Eleutherodactylus johnstoni — Gorzula, 1989, Herpetol. Rev., 20: 56. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Common Names
Johnstone's Robber Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 76).
Lesser Antillean Frog (Hedges, Powell, Henderson, Hanson, and Murphy, 2019, Caribb. Herpetol., 67: 11).
Distribution
The original distribution is unclear, although likely native to St. Lucia or the Antigua and Barbuda Bank, but also known from the islands of Guadeloupe, Martinique, Bequia, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Barbados, Grenada, Mustique, Canouan, an Carriacou; definitely introduced on Aruba, Anguilla, Bonaire, Curaçao, Trinidad, Jamaica, Bermuda, Dominica, Venezuela, Panama, Colombia, (Barranquilla, Tolima, Cali, Medellín), Curaçao, and Georgetown, Guyana, and coastal French Guiana (likely on coastal Suriname); São Paulo, Brazil, as well as the Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland, and possibly in Costa Rica. See comment.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Saint Lucia
Likely/Controversially Present: Suriname
Introduced: Anguilla, Aruba, Bermuda, Bonaire, Brazil, Colombia, Curaçao, Dominica, French Guiana, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guyana, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Panama, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Virgin Islands, British, Virgin Islands, U.S.
Comment
Both prior to and subsequent to the description of Eleutherodactylus johnstonei, the name Eleutherodactylus martinicensis Tschudi has been applied to the populations of frogs now called Eleutherodactylus johnstonei. Schwartz, 1967, Stud. Fauna Curaçao and other Caribb. Is., 24: 18–20, discussed the nomenclatural history of this species and noted that the fossil species Hyla barbudensis Auffenberg, 1958, is a synonym of this species. In the Eleutherodactylus auriculatus group, according to Schwartz, 1969, Stud. Fauna Curaçao and other Caribb. Is., 30: 101. See also account by Schwartz and Fowler, 1973, Stud. Fauna Curaçao and other Caribb. Is., 43: 65. See account by Kaiser and Hardy, 1994, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 581: 1–5. Murphy, 1997, Amph. Rept. Trinidad Tobago: 81–82, provided an account for Trinidad. Kaiser, Green, and Schmid, 1994, Canad. J. Zool., 72: 2217–2237, discussed the phylogenetic relationships of this species. In the Eleutherodactylus auriculatus section, Eleutherodactylus martinicensis series, Eleutherodactylus martinicensis group, according to Hedges, 1989, in Woods (ed.), Biogeograph. W. Indies: 327. In the Eleutherodactylus (Eleutherodactylus) martinicensis series, Eleutherodactylus martinicensis group of Lynch and Duellman, 1997, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 23: 226. Lescure and Marty, 2000, Collect. Patrimoines Nat., Paris, 45: 210–211, provided a photo and brief account for French Guiana. Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 271–272, provided an account and placed this species in his Eleutherodactylus martinicensis series, Eleutherodactylus martinicensis group. See comments regarding Venezuelan populations by Gorzula and Señaris, 1999 "1998", Scient. Guaianae, 8: 53. Barrio-Amorós, 1999 "1998", Acta Biol. Venezuelica, 18: 52, commented on the Venezuelan distribution. Kaiser, Barrio-Amorós, Trujillo, and Lynch, 2002, Herpetol. Rev., 33: 290–294, discussed introductions and current range in Venezuela. Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 271, noted a single specimen from Costa Rica, but did not know if an introduced population was thriving there. Lever, 2003, Naturalized Rept. Amph. World: 192–196 discussed the introduced populations on Bermuda, Panama, Venezuela, Colombia (Barranquilla area), Guyana, French Guiana, Curacao, Trinidad, Dominica, Guadeloupe, the Grenadines, Jamaica, Barbados, Grenada, and Martinique. In the Eleutherodactylus (Eleutherodactylus) martinicensis species series, Eleutherodactylus martinicensis species group of Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008, Zootaxa, 1737: 59–60, and of Padial, Grant, and Frost, 2014, Zootaxa, 3825: 129. Daudin and de Silva, 2007, Appl. Herpetol., 4: 163–175, reported on island distribution in the Grenadines, Lesser Antilles. Lorvelec, Pascal, Pavis, and Feldmann, 2007, Appl. Herpetol., 4: 131–161, discussed controversies regarding the native range and subsequent introductions. Ibáñez D. and Rand, 1990, Herpetol. Rev., 21: 37, provided a record for an introduced population in Panama. Ouboter and Jairam, 2012, Amph. Suriname: 334, commented on the lack of specimens from Suriname. Montes and Bernal-Bautista, 2012, Herpetol. Rev., 43: 439, provided a record for an introduced population in the municipality of Mariquita, Tolima, Colombia. See Cole, Townsend, Reynolds, MacCulloch, and Lathrop, 2013, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 125: 394, for brief account and records for Guyana. Henderson and Powell, 2009, Nat. Hist. Rept. Amph. W. Indies: 59–60, summarized the natural history literature. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 183–191, provided a key to the species of Eleutherodactylus in Central America and provided maps and photographs of the species, including this one. Melo, Lyra, Brischi, Geraldi, and Haddad, 2014, Salamandra, 50: 177–180, documented an introduced population in São Paulo, Brazil. Ernst, Massemin, and Kowarik, 2011, Biol. Invasions, 13: 1767–1777, discussed the range within French Guiana and briefly discussed its introductions along the Caribbean coasts and islands. De Massary, Bochaton, Bour, Dewynter, Ineich, Vidal, and Lescure, 2018, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 166: 59–78, reported the species from Saint-Barthélemy in the Lesser Antilles. De Massary, Bour, Dewynter, Ineich, Vidal, and Lescure, 2017, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 164: 37–54, reported the species from Saint Martin, Lesser Antilles. Leonhardt, Jiménez-Bolaño, and Ernst, 2019, NeoBiota, 45: 39–54, assessed the status of introduced populations in Colombia and briefly discussed introduced populations (those restricted to greenhouse populations in Switzerland, Germany, and the Netherlands not here counted as legitimately introduced populations). Breuil and Serre-Collet, 2012, Caribb. Herpetol., 31: 1, reported the species on Terre-de-Bas, and island associated with Guadeloupe. See Barrio-Amorós, Rojas-Runjaic, and Señaris, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (1: e180): 53, for comments on range and literature for Venezuela. Señaris and Rojas-Runjaic, 2020, in Rull and Carnaval (eds.), Neotrop. Divers. Patterns Process.: 571–632, commented on range and conservation status in the Venezuelan Guayana. González-Sánchez, Johnson, González-Solís, Fucsko, and Wilson, 2021, ZooKeys, 1022: 87, noted that the introduction into Costa Rica had failed. Ortega-Chinchilla, Cabanzo-Olarte, and Flechas-Hernández, 2022, Catal. Anf. Rept. Colombia, Medellín, 8: 27–34, provided a detailed review with a focus on Colombia of the literature, morphology, advertisement call, natural history, range in Colombia, and photographs. Yuan, Frederick, McGuire, Bell, Smith, Fenton, Cassius, Williams, Wang, Powell, and Hedges, 2022, Biol. Invasions, 24: 2707–2722, reported on molecular (mtDNA) phylogeography of which two major clades were delimited. Hedges, 2022, Zootaxa, 5219: 375–387, by naming Eleutherodactylus montserratae and showing that many of the introductions of nominal Eleutherodactylus johnstonei are actually of that species. Melo-Dias, Souza-Cruz, Moreira, Curi, Carvalho, Freitas, and Canedo, 2024, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 29: 38–65, discussed introduced populations in Brazil.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.