- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Breviceps adspersus Peters, 1882
Breviceps adspersus Peters, 1882, Naturwiss. Reise Mossambique, Zool. 3: 177. Syntypes: according to Bauer, Günther, and Robeck, 1996, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 72: 261, syntynpes are ZMB 6294 (formerly 2 specimens, now one in ZMB), MCZ 11619 (formerly one of the specimens registered under ZMB 6294, according to Barbour and Loveridge, 1929, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 69: 229), ZMB 6281 (formerly 2 specimens, now one remaining), and AMNH 23537 (formerly one of the specimens under ZMB 6281); remaining Berlin specimen under ZMB 6294 invalidly designated lectotype by implication ('Type') by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 194. Type locality: "Damaraland (Westafrika) [ZMB 6294], als aus Transvaal, zwischen 25 und 26° Br.; Gerlachshoop [Transvaal; remaining ZMB 6281]; and Botschabelo [Rep. South Africa, AMNH 23537]"; see discussion in Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 518–523.
Breviceps mossambicus var. occidentalis Werner, 1903, Abh. Math. Physik. Cl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., 22: 383. Holotype: ZSM, lost according to Glaw and Franzen, 2006, Spixiana, München, 29: 183. Type locality: "Deutsch-Südwestafrika" = South West Africa = Namibia. Synonymy by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 193; Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 80.
Breviceps pretoriensis FitzSimons, 1930, Ann. Transvaal Mus., 14: 45. Holotype: TMP 7537, by original designation. Type locality: "Jericho, Pretoria District", Gauteng Province, Rep. South Africa. Provisional synonymy by Parker, 1934, Monogr. Frogs Fam. Microhylidae: 193. Synonymy by Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 80.
Breviceps adspersus adspersus — Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 81; Poynton, 1964, Ann. Natal Mus., 17: 79.
Breviceps mossambicus adspersus — Broadley, 1971, Puku, 6: 111.
Common Names
South African Short-head (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World: 137).
Transvaal Blaasop (Breviceps adspersus adspersus: Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 81).
Transvaal Rain Frog (Breviceps adspersus adspersus: Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 81).
Blaasop (Wager, 1965, Frogs S. Afr.: 117; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 102).
Bullfrog (Broadley, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 33).
Bushveld Rain Frog (Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 4; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 102; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 108).
Common Rain Frog (Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 4; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 102; Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 213).
Common Rainfrog (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 15).
Common Short-headed Frog (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 15).
Peters' Rain Frog (Lambiris, 1990 "1989", Monogr. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 10: 69).
Transvaal Short-headed Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 87).
Distribution
Western to southwestern and east-central Angola (see comment) south to through northern and eastern Namibia, Botswana, southwestern Zambia, Zimbabwe, southern Mozambique, Eswatini, to northern Rep. South Africa, generally below 1400 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Angola, Botswana, Eswatini, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Comment
Complex differentiation at edge of range has led to a large synonymy, which needs more investigation; see Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 523–525, Lambiris, 1988, Lammergeyer, 39: 65–67, and Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 213–214. Minter, 1995, Madoqua, Windhoek, 19: 37–44, reported on the advertisement call and reproductive biology. Engelbrecht and Mulder, 2000, Afr. Zool., 35: 217–221, discussed the genetic differences between Breviceps adspersus adspersus and Breviceps adspersus pentheter. See accounts by Minter, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 172–173, Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 62, and Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 108–109 (who noted distinctive call differences between the nominal subspecies), provided brief accounts. Bates and Haacke, 2003, Navors. Nas. Mus. Bloemfontein, 19: 141, suggested the possible presence of this species (as Breviceps adspersus pentheri) in Lesotho. Nielsen, Daniels, Conradie, Heinicke, and Noonan, 2018, J. Biogeograph., 45: 2067–2079, found Breviceps adspersus pentheri to be a distinct lineage, far from Breviceps adspersus adspersus and not closest relatives. In the Breviceps mossambicus group of Nielsen, Daniels, Conradie, Heinicke, and Noonan, 2018, J. Biogeograph., 45: 2067–2079, who reported on molecular phylogenetics and biogeography. Marques, Ceríaco, Blackburn, and Bauer, 2018, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 65 (Suppl. II): 81–82, provided a map for Angola and provided a brief account noting that Angolan populations could be unnamed, Breviceps adspersus, or possibly Breviceps mossambicus. Nielsen, Conradie, Ceríaco, Bauer, Heinicke, Stanley, and Blackburn, 2020, ZooKeys, 979: 133–160, suggested that all Angolan records should be confirmed. Phaka, Netherlands, Kruger, and Du Preez, 2017, Bilingual Field Guide Frogs Zululand: 22, provided a photograph, Zululand regional map, and a brief account of life history and identification. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 116–117, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Heinicke, Beidoun, Nielsen, and Bauer, 2021, Herpetol. Notes, 14: 397–406, noted several unnamed species masquerading under this name.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.