- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Atelopus longirostris Cope, 1868
Atelopus longirostris Cope, 1868, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 20: 116. Type(s): Not stated, although likely originally in ANSP or USNM; apparently lost as not located in ANSP or USNM according to Peters, 1973, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 145: 27. Type locality: "Valley of Quito", Ecuador; probably in error according to Peters, 1973, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 145: 28.
Antelopus longirostris — Orton, 1876, Andes and the Amazons: 108. Incorrect subsequent spelling of the generic name.
Phryniscus longirostris — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 153.
Phryniscus boussingaulti Thominot, 1889, Bull. Soc. Philomath., Paris, Ser. 8, 1: 28. Holotype: MNHNP 207, according to Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 32. Type locality: "entre Latacungua et Guayaquil, au sud de Quito"; considered to be "Equateur" by Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 32. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1890, Zool. Rec., 26: 21; Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 32.
Atelopus longirostris — Boulenger, 1894, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, 14: 374–375.
Atelopus longirostris marmorata Werner, 1901, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 51: 600. Types: NHMW, lost according to Peters, 1973, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 145: 43. Type locality: "Ecuador". Considered a nomen dubium by Peters, 1973, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 145: 43.
Atelopus longirostris marmoratus — Rivero, 1963, Caribb. J. Sci., 3: 108.
Common Names
Longnose Stubfoot Toad (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 39).
Scrawny Stubfoot-toad (Arteaga-Navarro, Bustamante, and Guayasamin, 2013, Amph. Rept. Mindo: 32).
Longnose Harlequin Frog (Freile, Coloma, Terán-Valdez, Acosta-López, Tapia, and Pazmiño-Otamendi, 2020, Anfibios de Junín: 25).
Distribution
Cloud forests of northwestern lower slopes of the Andes of Ecuador (200 to 2500 m elevation) and Chocoan lowlands, in the provinces of Cotopaxi, Esmeraldas, Imbabura, Pichincha, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, and Carchi. See comment regarding the Valle de Cauca, Colombia, record.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Ecuador
Likely/Controversially Present: Colombia
Endemic: Ecuador
Comment
In the Atelopus flavescens group of Lynch, 1993, Alytes, 11: 77–87. See Cannatella, 1981, J. Herpetol., 15: 135–137, for discussion, and Peters, 1973, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 145: 27–30, for discussion and accounts. Lötters, 1996, Neotrop. Toad Genus Atelopus: 34, discussed controversy over identity of frogs from Colombia (Departamento Valle and Departamento Santander) assigned to this species by other authors. Ruiz-Carranza, Ardila-Robayo, and Lynch, 1996, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 20: 366, regarded the Santander record to be based on misidentification but accepted the Valle de Cauca, Colombia, record. See map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 136, who regarded the species as extinct. Galvis-Peñuela and Cisneros-Heredia, 2005, in Rueda-Almonacid et al. (eds.), Ranas Arlequines: 53, provided a brief account, opined that the Colombia population might represent a distinct species, and also judged the species extinct in Ecuador. Arteaga-Navarro, Bustamante, and Guayasamin, 2013, Amph. Rept. Mindo: 32–33, provided an account for Ecuador and rejected that the species occurs in the Departamento de Valle del Cauca, Colombia, although it seems that the controversy has not been addressed except by repetition. Tapia, Coloma, Pazmiño-Otamendi, and Peñafiel, 2017, Neotropical Biodiversity, 3: 157–167, reported on rediscovery of this nearly extinct frog in Imbabura, Ecuador, and provided natural history observations. See Freile, Coloma, Terán-Valdez, Acosta-López, Tapia, and Pazmiño-Otamendi, 2020, Anfibios de Junín: 24–25, for brief account (identification, tadpole morphology, habitat, range) and photograph.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to Ecuador see FaunaWebEcuador: Anfibios del Ecuador
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.