- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Bufo praetextatus Boie, 1826
Bufo praetextatus Boie, 1826, Isis von Oken, 18: 215. Types: Not stated and presumed lost (although the other types described in this paper are in the ZMA). Type locality: "Vitikairu, et Fikikojeru et Nakfudo Jap.". Considered an unidentifiable nomen dubium by Stejneger, 1907, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 58: 59, although he also considered it a possible senior synonym of Bufo japonicus. Considered a senior synonym of Bufo vulgaris japonicus by Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 17.
Bufo vulgaris japonicus Temminck and Schlegel, 1838, Fauna Japonica, 3: 106. Syntypes: Not stated, although including animals figured in pl. 2, figs. 5 and 6 of the original publication. Syntypes include RMNH 2109, 2115–17, 2119, with RMNH 2119A designated lectotype according to and by Matsui, 1984, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 26: 407. Type locality: "Japon". Synonymy by Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 17, and Dufresnes and Litvinchuk, 2022, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 195: 700.
Bufo vulgaris var. praetextatus — Martens, 1876, Preuss. Exped. Ost-Asien, Zool.: 384. Considered incorrectly by Stejneger, 1907, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 58: 60, to be a new name, a junior homonym of Bufo praetextatus Boie, 1826. Martens noted the author of the name as Boie.
Bufo japonicus — Camerano, 1879, Atti Accad. Sci. Torino, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., 14: 884.
Bufo praetextatus — Camerano, 1901 "1900", Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino, Ser. 2, 50: 113. Dufresnes and Litvinchuk, 2022, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 195: 695–760, supported the distinction of Bufo andrewsi from Bufo gargarizans on genetic grounds.
Bufo bufo japonicus — Stejneger, 1907, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 58: 69; Gee and Boring, 1929, Peking Nat. Hist. Bull., 4: 22; Pope, 1931, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 61: 457.
Bufo vulgaris hokkaidoensis Okada, 1928, Annot. Zool. Japon., 11: 269. Holotype: TIU 1506, lost by implication of Maeda and Matsui, 1990, Frogs Toads Japan, Ed. 2: 31. Type locality: "Hokkaido", Japan. Synonymy by Matsui, 1984, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 26: 404.
Bufo vulgaris formosus — Okada, 1931, Tailless Batr. Japan. Empire: 32.
Bufo vulgaris montanus Okada, 1937, Saito Ho-on Kwai Mus. Res. Bull., 12: 189. Holotype: Saito Ho-on Kai Museum Reg. no. 5553. Type locality: "Chôkai-zan, Akumi-gun, Yamagata-Ken", Tohoku District, Japan. Primary homonym of Bufo montanus Werner, 1897. Synonymy by Matsui, 1984, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 26: 404.
Bufo bufo japonicus — Nakamura and Ueno, 1963, Japan. Rept. Amph. Color: 27.
Bufo bufo hokkaidoensis — Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 15.
Bufo bufo montanus — Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 15.
Bufo bufo yakushimensis — Okada, 1966, Fauna Japon., Anura: 21.
Bufo torrenticola Matsui, 1976, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 25: 1. Holotype: OMNH Am 4202, by original designation. Type locality: "Shiokara-dani Valley, 1400 metres on Mt. Hidegatake, Ohdaigahara, Nara Prefecture, [Honshu I.], Japan". Synonymy with Bufo japonicus by Fukutani, Matsui, Tran, and Nishikawa, 2022, PeerJ, 10 (e13452): 2.
Bufo japonicus — Kawamura, Nishioka, and Ueda, 1980, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 4: 1–125.
Bufo bufo formosus — Matsui, 1980, Annot. Zool. Japon., 53: 57.
Bufo japonicus hokkaidoensis — Kawamura, Nishioka, and Ueda, 1980, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 4: 1–125. Distinctiveness from Bufo japonicus japonicus doubted by Kawamura, Nishioka, Sumida, and Ryuzaki, 1990, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 10: 1-51.
Bufo japonicus montanus — Kawamura, Nishioka, and Ueda, 1980, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 4: 1-125; Kawamura, Nishioka, Sumida, and Ryuzaki, 1990, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 10: 1-51.
Bufo japonicus yakushimensis — Kawamura, Nishioka, and Ueda, 1980, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 4: 1-125; Kawamura, Nishioka, Sumida, and Ryuzaki, 1990, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 10: 1-51.
Bufo japonicus japonicus — Matsui, 1984, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 26: 404.
Bufo (Bufo) japonicus — Dubois and Bour, 2010, Zootaxa, 2447: 24.
Bufo (Bufo) japonicus japonicus — Dubois and Bour, 2010, Zootaxa, 2447: 24.
Bufo praetextatus — Dufresnes and Litvinchuk, 2022, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 195: 700. See comment.
Common Names
Japanese Toad (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World: 96; Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 39; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 42).
Western Japanese Common Toad (Bufo japonicus japonicus: Maeda and Matsui, 1990, Frogs Toads Japan, Ed. 2: 19; Goris and Maeda, 2004, Guide Amph. Rept. Japan: 48).
Distribution
Western and central Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu, as well as the Tanegashima Group of islands, Japan
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Japan
Endemic: Japan
Comment
See comment under Bufo formosus. In the Bufo bufo group; considered a subspecies of Bufo bufo, in most pre-1980 literature but considered a distinct species by Kawamura, Nishioka, and Ueda, 1980, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 4: 1-125. See also Matsui, 1980, Annot. Zool. Japon., 53: 56-68, and Matsui, 1976, Japan. J. Herpetol., 6: 80-92. Matsui, 1984, Contrib. Biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., 26: 210-428, revised the species, reported on morphometrics and geographic variation. See also Nishioka, Sumida, Ueda, and Wu, 1990, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 10: 53-91, and Kawamura, Nishioka, Sumida, and Ryuzaki, 1990, Sci. Rep. Lab. Amph. Biol. Hiroshima Univ., 10: 1-51, for allozymic variation. Highton, 2000, in Bruce et al., Biol. Plethodontid Salamanders: 233, suggested that two species might be covered under this one name, these having parapatric contact at Neo-mura, Motoso-gun, Gifu Prefecture, Japan. See Maeda and Matsui, 1990, Frogs Toads Japan, Ed. 2: 18-23, for accounts. Goris and Maeda, 2004, Guide Amph. Rept. Japan: 48-52, provided accounts for Bufo japonicus japonicus and Bufo japonicus formosus. Yamazaki, Kouketsu, Fukuda, Araki, and Nambu, 2008, J. Herpetol., 42: 427-436, documented introgression of Bufo japonicus formosus with Bufo torrenticola. Comment by DRF: The taxonomy of this group is controversial in part by application of different species concepts. Those who apply the Biological Species concept tend to see nominal Bufo japonicus as composed of several allopatric subspecies, while those who apply the Phylogenetic Species concept tend to see multiple species. What does seem clear is that there are several units that are distinctive lineages and which may or may not be mechanistically reproductively isolated to various degrees. These are Bufo miyakonis from Miyako Island (see Bufo gargarizans account) in the Ryukyus, Bufo torrenticola (which introgresses with Bufo japonicus to an unknown degree), Bufo formosus (the "eastern form" of the Japanese toad), Bufo japonicus, the "western form" of the Japanese toad (with both the eastern and western clade containing subclades that warrant additional study as possibly coherent lineages), Bufo bankorensis from Taiwan, Bufo yakushimensis (from Yaku Island, Japan), and Bufo gargarizans from China. Recognition of Bufo torrenticola and Bufo yakushimensis as species distinct from Bufo japonicus (western mtDNA clade) appears to render the latter "paraphyletic" in the sense that its mtDNA form a paraphyletic series; whether this is incomplete lineage sorting or the result of introgression is not known. The status of Bufo japonicus montanus appears questionable on the basis of mtDNA that it should be considered separate from Bufo japonicus (eastern clade). Suzuki, Kawase, Hoshina, and Tokuda, 2020, Curr. Herpetol., Kyoto, 39: 47–54, employed mtDNA data to infer that the Hokkaido population of nominal Bufo japonicus formosus was derived from introductions from mid-eastern Honshu, Japan. Tanaka and Nishikawa, 2022, Curr. Herpetol., Kyoto, 41: 8–23, compared morphological larval development with that of Bufo torrenticola. Sawada, Aihara, and Kamijo, 2022, J. Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 15: 345–353, developed a predictive model for the developing range of this introduced species (as Bufo japonicus) on Sado Island, Japan. Dufresnes and Litvinchuk, 2022, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 195: 700, discussed the justification for applying the name Bufo praetextatus over Bufo japonicus. Fukutani, Matsui, and Nishikawa, 2023, PeerJ, 11(e16302): 1–27, reported on hybrid zones between this lineage and Bufo formosus, noting a narrow hybrid zone in one area and broad zones in two others.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.