- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Didynamipus Andersson, 1903
Didynamipus Andersson, 1903, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 53: 143. Type species: Didynamipus sjöstedti Andersson, 1903, by monotypy.
Atelophryne Boulenger, 1906 "1905", Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, Ser. 3, 2: 159. Type species: Atelophryne minuta Boulenger, 1906, by monotypy. Synonymy by Mertens, 1965, Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 16: 19 (not Noble, 1924, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 49: 147-347, as reported by Grandison, 1981, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Suppl., 15: 188).
Common Names
Four-digit Toads (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 44).
Dwarf Toads (Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 94).
Distribution
Bioko (Equatorial Guinea) and extreme southwestern Cameroon to Nigeria.
Comment
The phylogenetic relationships of this genus were discussed by Grandison, 1981, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Suppl., 15: 187-215. Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 129, suggested on the basis of DNA sequence evidence that Didynamipus is most closely related to Nectophrynoides among the exemplars studied by those authors. Smith and Chiszar, 2006, Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 1: 6-8, implied that this taxon should be considered a subgenus of Bufo; see comment under Bufonidae. Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1-10, did not address this genus. Van Bocxlaer, Loader, Roelants, Biju, Menegon, and Bossuyt, 2010, Science, 327: 679-682, suggested that Didynamipus phylogenetically isolated, in the neighborhood of Schismaderma, Churamiti, Nectophrynoides, but not demonstratably close to them. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 142, suggested that the species is a direct-developer.
Contained taxa (1 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist