- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Aromobatidae Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, and Wheeler, 2006
Aromobatidae Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 299: 157.
Aromobatinae — Santos, Coloma, Summers, Caldwell, Ree, and Cannatella, 2009, PLoS Biol., 7(3)e56: 44.
Common Names
Cryptic Forest Frogs (Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 460).
Cryptic Poison Frog (Hedges, Powell, Henderson, Hanson, and Murphy, 2019, Caribb. Herpetol., 67: 7. [Unfortunately, this is a non-toxic clade–DRF]).
Distribution
Pacific slopes the Andes in Colombia and Ecuador; eastern slopes of the Andes from Venezuela to Bolivia, throughout the Amazonian region, and in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil; southern Nicaragua to Colombia.
Comment
See comment under Dendrobatidae, with which the literature of Aromobatidae was identical until the recent taxonomic revision by Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 299: 1-268. Lötters, Jungfer, Henkel, and Schmidt, 2007, Poison Frogs: 44-55, provided accounts and discussed the evidence for the phylogenetic placement of the family. Santos, Coloma, Summers, Caldwell, Ree, and Cannatella, 2009, PLoS Biol., 7(3: e1000056): 1-14, provided a discussion of phylogenetics and biogeography, disputed recognition of Aromobatidae at that rank, but corroborated the phylogenetic structure upon which this partition was based. They also presented in their tree (their Fig. S3A) the unexpected result of Allobates alagoanus (= Allobates olfersioides) as the sister taxon of all remaining aromobatids, but did not comment on this anomaly, which, if not due to some error, suggests that both Allobates and Allobatinae are paraphyletic with respect to Anomaloglossinae and Aromobatinae, both of which they recovered as monophyletic. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543-583, confirmed the monophyly of this group and its sister-taxon status of Dendrobatidae, although they did not include Allobates alagoanus, but found Rheobates as the sister taxon of all other aromobatids, therefore suggesting the paraphyly of Anomaloglossinae; they also adopted the taxonomy of Santos et al., 2009. Blackburn and Wake, 2011, In Zhang (ed.), Zootaxa, 3148: 39-55, retained Aromobatidae and discussed the controversy as well as dispensing with subfamilies due to the apparent paraphyly of Allobates and Anomaloglossinae. These subfamilies are provisionally retained pending an overall analysis. Cole, Townsend, Reynolds, MacCulloch, and Lathrop, 2013, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 125: 317-578, provided identification keys and accounts for the species in Guyana. Sánchez, 2013, Zootaxa, 3637: 569–591, reported on comparative larval morphology. Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed., provided a summary of life history, diagnosis, and taxonomy. Grant, Rada, Anganoy-Criollo, Batista, Dias, Jeckel, Machado, and Rueda-Almonacid, 2017, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 12 (Special Issue): 1–90, provided a detailed phylogenetic analysis and revisonary notes on the systematics of the group.
Contained taxa (137 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist