- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Colostethus Cope, 1866
Colostethus Cope, 1866, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 18: 130. Type species: Phyllobates latinasus Cope, 1863, by original designation.
Prostherapis Cope, 1868, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 20: 96-140. Type species: Prostherapis inguinalis Cope, 1868, by monotypy. Synonymy with Phyllobates (sensu lato) by Cochran, 1966, Mem. Inst. Butantan, São Paulo, 33: 61-65. Synonymy with Colostethus by Savage, 1968, Copeia, 1968: 751; Edwards, 1971, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 84: 147-162; Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 299: 165.
Prestherapis — Donoso-Barros, 1965, Not. Mens. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Santiago, 102: 1. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Prostherapis.
Common Names
Rocket Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 48).
Distribution
Eastern two-thirds of Panama to throughout most of Andean Colombia, south to central Ecuador; isolated population in northern Peru.
Comment
See Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 299: 1–268, for delimitation of this genus and its taxonomic history. Santos, Coloma, Summers, Caldwell, Ree, and Cannatella, 2009, PLoS Biol., 7(3: e1000056): 1–14, discussed phylogenetics and biogeography and suggested that Colostethus as currently recognized is paraphyletic with respect to Ameerega. In associated electronic text (Santos, Coloma, Summers, Caldwell, Ree, and Cannatella, 2009, PLoS Biol., 7(3)e56: 44), they restricted Colostethus to the group containing Colostethus latinasus (the type-species), while the group composed of Colostethus fraterdanieli, Colostethus argyrogaster and Colostethus fugax, was obtained as the sister taxon of Ameerega, rendering Colostethus (sensu lato) paraphyletic. They did not name the "Colostethus" group close to Ameerega, but presumably will in the future. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed the results of Santos et al., 2009, but did not remedy the paraphyly. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 130–131, provided a key to the species in Central America and provided a map and photographs of this species. Grant, Rada, Anganoy-Criollo, Batista, Dias, Jeckel, Machado, and Rueda-Almonacid, 2017, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 12 (Special Issue): 1–90, noted that the Colostethus ruthveni group (Colostethus ruthveni and an unnamed species) sits within Dendrobatinae.
Contained taxa (12 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist