- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Epipedobates anthonyi (Noble, 1921)
Phyllobates anthonyi Noble, 1921, Am. Mus. Novit., 29: 5. Holotype: AMNH 13739, by original designation. Type locality: "small stream at Salvias, Prov. del Oro, Ecuador".
Colostethus anthonyi — Edwards, 1971, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 84: 148.
Phyllobates anthonyi — Silverstone, 1976, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 27: 5.
Dendrobates anthonyi — Myers, Daly, and Malkin, 1978, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 161: 332.
Epipedobates anthonyi — Myers, 1987, Pap. Avulsos Zool., São Paulo, 36: 303.
Ameerega anthonyi — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 130, by implication.
Common Names
None noted.
Distribution
Southwestern Ecuador (Azuay, El Oro, and Loja provinces) and northwestern Peru (Ancash, Piura, and Tumbes departments), west of the Andes, 153–1387 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Ecuador, Peru
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Epipedobates tricolor by Schulte, 1999, Pfeilgiftfrösche: 271, where it had been placed by Henle, 1992, Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 43: 79–129, and Duellman and Wild, 1993, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 157: 1–53. Graham, Ron, Santos, Schneider, and Moritz, 2004, Evolution, 58: 1781–1793, refined the distribution of this taxon and compared it with Epipedobates tricolor. Lötters, Jungfer, Henkel, and Schmidt, 2007, Poison Frogs: 395–403, provided an account. See statement of geographic range, habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 614. Armijos-Ojeda, Székely, Székely, Cogǎlniceanu, Cisneros-Heredia, Ordóñez-Delgado, Escudero, and Espinosa, 2021, ZooKeys, 1063: 37, provided a dot map for southwestern Ecuador and northwestern Peru.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to Ecuador see FaunaWebEcuador: Anfibios del Ecuador
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.