- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Phyllobates aurotaenia (Boulenger, 1913)
Dendrobates aurotaenia Boulenger, 1913, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1913: 1029. Holotype: BMNH 1947.2.15.13 (formerly 1913.11.12.94), according to museum records. Type locality: "Peña Lisa, Condoto, 300 feet", Departamento Chocó, Colombia.
Phyllobates aurotaenia — Dunn, 1957, Copeia, 1957: 78.
Phyllobates (Phyllobates) aurotaenia — Bauer, 1988, Het Paludarium, Netherlands, November: 6.
Common Names
Kokoe Poison Frog (Walls, 1994, Jewels of the Rainforest: 28; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 51).
Distribution
Wet forests of the Chocoan region of western Colombia (Chocó department) in the San Juan drainage, 90–1000 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Colombia
Endemic: Colombia
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Ameerega femoralis (as Phyllobates femoralis) by Silverstone, 1976, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 27: 21, where it had been placed by Cochran and Goin, 1970, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 288: 40. Lötters, Jungfer, Henkel, and Schmidt, 2007, Poison Frogs: 418–420, provided an account. See statement of geographic range, habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 614. González-Santoro, Hernández-Restrepo, and Palacios-Rodríguez, 2021, Herpetol. Notes, 14: 1145–1149, reported on courtship and advertisement call. Southern populations of this species, as formerly understood, were segregated as Phyllobates samperi by Amézquita, Vargas-Salinas, Ramos, Palacios-Rodríguez, Salazar, Quiroz, Bolívar-García, Galindo-Uribe, and Mazariegos-H., 2024, ZooKeys, 1212: 217–240, who provided a dot map of the revised distribution.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.