- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hemisotidae Cope, 1867
Hemisidae Cope, 1867, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 198. Type genus: Hemisus Günther, 1859 "1858".
Hemisina — Mivart, 1869, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1869: 288. Explicit subfamily.
Hemisotina — Günther, 1870, Zool. Rec., 6: 119. Justified emendation.
Hemisiinae — Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926, Arq. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 27: 19.
Hemisinae — Noble, 1931, Biol. Amph.: 540.
Hemisotidae — Frost and Savage, 1987, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 33: 24.
Hemisotoidae — Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 309. Epifamily.
Common Names
Shovelnosed Frogs (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 51).
Shovelsnouted Frogs (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 51).
Shovelnose Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 51).
Shovel-nosed Frogs (Vitt and Caldwell, 2009, Herpetology, 3rd Ed.: 468).
Snout-burrowers (Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: v).
Distribution
Africa south of the Sahara.
Comment
Lynch, 1973, in Vial (ed.), Evol. Biol. Anurans: 133–210, regarded Hemisotidae (as Hemisinae of Ranidae) as forming an unresolved polytomy with Hyperoliidae and Ranidae (in the sense of including Arthroleptidae of this list). Haas, 2003, Cladistics, 19: 23–89, suggested on the basis of larval morphology that Hemisotidae is the sister-taxon of Hyperoliidae. (Haas did not study the direct-developing Brevicipitidae.) Laurent, 1980 "1979", Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 104: 417, raised the Linnaean rank of this taxon from subfamilial status within his Hyperoliidae (from within the Ranidae of other authors) to familial status. See discussion under Arthroleptidae. Blommers-Schlösser, 1993, Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 5: 199–218, suggested a close relationship of Hemisus and Breviceps, but this was considered premature by Channing, 1995, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 44: 55–57. Emerson, Richards, Drewes, and Kjer, 2000, Herpetologica, 56: 209–230, suggested that Hemisus was phylogenetically within Microhylidae. van der Meijden, Vences, and Meyer, 2004, Proc. R. Soc. London, B—Suppl. Biol. Lett., 271: S378–S381, presented molecular evidence of a close relationship of Hemisotidae and Brevicipitinae (Microhylidae). Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297, suggested that Hemisotidae is the sister taxon of Brevicipitidae, and together the sister taxon of Hyperoliidae and Arthroleptidae. Dubois, 2005, Alytes, 23: 13, arbitrarily considered Hemisotidae to be one of six subfamilies in an enlarged Brevicipitidae. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, confirmed the arrangement of Breviceps + (Callulina + (Spelaeophryne + Probreviceps)); like authors before them they did not have sequences of Balebreviceps. Blackburn and Wake, 2011, In Zhang (ed.), Zootaxa, 3148: 39–55, discussed briefly the taxonomic history of the group. Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed., provided a summary of life history, diagnosis, and taxonomy. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 176–180, reported on comparative tadpole morphology. Yuan, Zhang, Raxworthy, Weisrock, Hime, Jin, Lemmon, Lemmon, Holland, Kortyna, Zhou, Peng, Che, and Prendini, 2018, Natl. Sci. Rev., Beijing, 6: 10–14, reported on phylogenetics and biogeography as an element of Natatanura. Portik, Bell, Blackburn, Bauer, Barratt, Branch, Burger, Channing, Colston, Conradie, Dehling, Drewes, Ernst, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Harvey, Hillers, Hirschfeld, Jongsma, Kielgast, Kouete, Lawson, Leaché, Loader, Lötters, van der Meijden, Menegon, Müller, Nagy, Ofori-Boateng, Ohler, Papenfuss, Rößler, Sinsch, Rödel, Veith, Vindum, Zassi-Boulou, and McGuire, 2019, Syst. Biol., 68: 866, confirmed the monophyly of Xenosyneunitanura, a taxon composed of Hemisotidae and Brevicipitidae, as a member of Afrobatrachia. Elias-Costa, Araujo-Vieira, and Faivovich, 2021, Cladistics, 37: 498–517, discussed the evolution of submandibular musculature optimized on the tree of Jetz and Pyron, 2018, Nature Ecol. & Evol., 2: 850–858, which provided morphological synapomorphies of Hemisotidae + Brevicipitidae.
Contained taxa (9 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist