- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Running log of additions and changes, 2021
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2020
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project
- The big changes in amphibian taxonomy (2006–2013): versions 5.6 and 6.0
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors, 1985 edition
- Contributors, online edition
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Dendropsophus sanborni (Schmidt, 1944)
Hyla sanborni Schmidt, 1944, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Ser., 29: 153. Holotype: FMNH 9581, by original designation. Type locality: "Hacienda Alvarez, 15 Km northeast of San Carlos, Uruguay".
Hyla nana sanborni — Barrio, 1967, Physis, Buenos Aires, 26: 521.
Hyla sanborni — Basso, Perí, and di Tada, 1985, Cuad. Herpetol., 1: 1-11.
Dendropsophus sanborni — Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 92.
English Names
Sanborn's Treefrog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 57).
Distribution
Southern Paraguay, central and eastern Argentina, Uruguay, and southern Brazil.
Comment
In the Hyla microcephala group according to Langone and Basso, 1987, Comun. Zool. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, 11: 1-17; and Klappenbach and Langone, 1992, An. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, Ser. 2, 8: 179. Resurrected from the synonymy of Hyla nana by Basso, Perí, and di Tada, 1985, Cuad. Herpetol., 1: 1-11. See Langone and Basso, 1987, Comun. Zool. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, 11: 1-17. See comment under Hyla nana. Achaval and Olmos, 2003, Anf. Rept. Uruguay, ed. 2: 42, provided a brief account and photograph for the Uruguay population. In the Dendropsophus microcephalus group of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 91-92. Brusquetti and Lavilla, 2006, Cuad. Herpetol., 20: 8-9, briefly discussed the range in Paraguay. Stetson, Benítez, and Pividori, 1996, Cuad. Herpetol., 9: 100-111, provided the first record for Misiones, Argentina. Stetson, 1999, Cuad. Herpetol., 13: 103, provided records for the provinces of Chaco and Formosa, Argentina. Landgref, Godoi, and Souza, 2012, Herpetol. Rev., 43: 97, provided a record for Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, and briefly commented on the range.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist; for a quick link to their maps see iNaturalist KML
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.