- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Nyctimantis siemersi (Mertens, 1937)
Hyla siemersi Mertens, 1937, Senckenb. Biol., 19: 12. Holotype: SMF 22249, according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 8. Type locality: "Buenos Aires, am Rio de la Plata", Provincia Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hyla (Trachycephalus) siemersi — Cei and Pierotti, 1957, An. Depto. Invest. Cient. Secc. Biol. Univ. Nac. Cuyo, Tucuman, 2: 12.
Trachycephalus siemersi — Klappenbach, 1961, Comun. Zool. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo, 5: 1.
Argenteohyla siemersi — Trueb, 1970, Herpetologica, 26: 258.
Argenteohyla siemersi siemersi — Williams and Bosso, 1994, Cuad. Herpetol., 8: 57-62.
Argenteohyla siemersi pederseni Williams and Bosso, 1994, Cuad. Herpetol., 8: 58. Holotype: MLP A 876, by original designation. Type locality: "Argentina, Corrientes, cruce de la ruta nacional 12 y el río Santa Lucia en las proximadades de San Roque".
Nyctimantis siemersi — Blotto, Lyra, Cardoso, Rodrigues, Dias, Marciano, Vechio, Orrico, Brandão, Assis, Lantyer-Silva, Rutherford, Gagliardi-Urrutia, Solé, Baldo, Nunes, Cajade, Torres, Grant, Jungfer, Silva, Haddad, and Faivovich, 2021, Cladistics, 37: 71.
Common Names
Red-spotted Argentina Frogs (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 52).
Distribution
Drainages and mouth of the Río Paraná (Santa Fé, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, and Buenos Aires provinces) in Argentina, adjacent south-central Paraguay, and southern coast of Uruguay.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay
Comment
Lavilla and Cei, 2001, Monogr. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 28: 40, noted that the two nominal subspecies were likely distinct species. Achaval and Olmos, 2003, Anf. Rept. Uruguay, ed. 2: 49, provided a brief account and photograph for the Uruguay population. Brusquetti and Lavilla, 2006, Cuad. Herpetol., 20: 7, briefly discussed the range in Paraguay. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 239. Lajmanovích, Peltzer, Attademo, Cabagna, Junges, and Basso, 2012, Check List, 8: 790-791, provided a record of Argenteohyla siemersi pederseni from Santa Fé Province, Argentina, and commented on the range. Zaracho and Areta, 2008, FACENA, 24: 49–57, noted advertisement call differences between the nominal subspecies, Argenteohyla siemersi pederseni and Argenteohyla siemersi siemersi, suggesting that they may represent distinct species. Cajade, Schaefer, Duré, Kehr, and Marangoni, 2010, J. Nat. Hist., London, 44: 1953–1978, reported on the advertisement call of Argenteohyla siemersi pederseni. Weiler, Núñez, Airaldi, Lavilla, Peris, and Baldo, 2013, Anf. Paraguay: 54, provided a brief account (as Argenteohyla siemersi pederseni), image, and dot map for Paraguay. Forti, Foratto, Márquez, Pereira, and Toledo, 2018, PeerJ, 6(e4813): 1–19, provided a characterization of the advertisement call. Ferraro, Blotto, Baldo, Barrasso, Barrionuevo, Basso, Cardozo, Cotichelli, Faivovich, Pereyra, and Lavilla, 2018, in Vaira, Akmentins, and Lavilla (eds.), Cuad. Herpetol., 32 (Supl. 1): 17–19, noted that the taxonomic status of this nominal subspecies remains problematic. Blotto, Lyra, Cardoso, Rodrigues, Dias, Marciano, Vechio, Orrico, Brandão, Assis, Lantyer-Silva, Rutherford, Gagliardi-Urrutia, Solé, Baldo, Nunes, Cajade, Torres, Grant, Jungfer, Silva, Haddad, and Faivovich, 2021, Cladistics, 37: 36–72, discussed the phylogenetic placement of the species and noted that the nominal subspecies are likely not different, although they suggested that further work is needed.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.