- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Phytotriades Jowers, Downieb, and Cohen, 2009
Phytotriades Jowers, Downieb, and Cohen, 2009, Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 43: 186. Type species: Amphodus auratus Boulenger, 1917, by original designation.
Common Names
Trinidad Golden Treefrogs (Hedges, Powell, Henderson, Hanson, and Murphy, 2019, Caribb. Herpetol., 67: 13).
Distribution
As for the single species.
Comment
The content of the taxon remains unelucidated. Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 1–240, placed this species in the Phyllodytes auratus group, along with Phyllodytes wuchereri, following Caramaschi, Peixoto, and Rodrigues, 2004, Arq. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 62: 185-191. Jowers, Downieb, and Cohen, 2009, Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ., 43: 186, did not address Phyllodytes wuchereri in their analysis, nor most of the putative members of Phyllodytes, so, although it is clear that "Phyllodytes" (sensu lato) is polyphyletic, it is not clear what the ultimate membership in either Phyllodytes or Phytotriades will be—DRF. These authors placed Phytotriades as the sister taxon of Argenteohyla. Wiens, Kuczynski, Hua, and Moen, 2010, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 5555: 871-882, considered the recognition of Phytotriades disinct from Phyllodytes premature on the basis of their parsimony analysis. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543-583, in their molecular study, but seemingly excluding the rhodopsin data from Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294, suggested that Phytotriades auratus (their Phyllodytes auratus) is the sister taxon of Itapotihyla, rather than close to Phyllodytes luteolus. Blotto, Lyra, Cardoso, Rodrigues, Dias, Marciano, Vechio, Orrico, Brandão, Assis, Lantyer-Silva, Rutherford, Gagliardi-Urrutia, Solé, Baldo, Nunes, Cajade, Torres, Grant, Jungfer, Silva, Haddad, and Faivovich, 2021, Cladistics, 37: 36–72, discussed the instability of phylogenetic placement of this taxon. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 441, recovered this taxon far from Phyllodytes in their overall tree.
Contained taxa (1 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist