- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Pseudacris kalmi Harper, 1955
Chorophilus triseriatus corporalis Cope, 1875, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 1: 30. Type(s): Not designated, presumably originally in USNM or ANSP. Type locality: "New Jersey", USA. Nomen nudum. Synonymy by Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 172.
Pseudacris nigrita kalmi Harper, 1955, Nat. Hist. Misc., 150: 1. Holotype: CM 33917, by original designation. Type locality: "Centreton, 5 miles northeast of Moorestown, Burlington County, New Jersey . . . . Centreton is on the south side of Rancocas Creek . . . . The same locality is designated as Bougher on the Mount Holly quadrangle of the U.S. Geological Survey (1898)", USA.
Pseudacris triseriata kalmi — Schwartz, 1957, Am. Mus. Novit., 1838: 11.
Hyla (Pseudacris) triseriata kalmi — Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 86.
Pseudacris feriarum kalmi — Hedges, 1986, Syst. Zool., 35: 11.
Pseudacris kalmi — Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12; Powell, Collins, and Hooper, 1998, Key Amph. Rept. Continent. U.S. Canada: 39.
Pseudacris (Pseudacris) kalmi — Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 349.
Common Names
New Jersey Chorus Frog (Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 176; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 12; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 63; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 12; Frost, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2008, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 37: 10; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 7; Frost, McDiarmid, Mendelson, and Green, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 19; Frost, Lemmon, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 17).
Cope's Tree Frog (Chorophilus triseriatus corporalis [no longer recognized]: Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 23).
Distribution
Southern New Jersey to and including the Delmarva Peninsula of Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: United States of America, United States of America - Delaware, United States of America - Maryland, United States of America - New Jersey, United States of America - Pennsylvania
Endemic: United States of America
Comment
Cocroft and Ryan, 1995, Animal Behav., 49: 283–303, discussed advertisement call in an evolutionary context.In the Pseudacris nigrita group of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 106. Removed from the synonymy of Pseudacris triseriata by Hedges, 1986, Syst. Zool., 35: 1–21. Platz, 1989, Copeia, 1989: 704–712, retained Pseudacris feriarum and Pseudacris kalmi as subspecies of one species but suggested that they might also be distinct species on the basis of data presented by Hedges. Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12, considered these to be distinct species without discussion and this was confirmed by Lemmon, Lemmon, Collins, Lee-Yaw, and Cannatella, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 44: 1068–1082. Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 1: 367–370, provided an account that summarized the relevant literature. Elliot, Gerhardt, and Davidson, 2009, Frogs and Toads of N. Am.: 90–91, provided an account, photos, and advertisement call. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 210–212, provided an account of larval morphology and biology.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.