- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Pseudacris maculata (Agassiz, 1850)
Hylodes maculatus Agassiz, 1850, Lake Superior: 378. Syntypes: MCZ 38 (2 specimens), according to Barbour and Loveridge, 1929, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 69: 281. Type locality: "Region of Lake Superior"; given as "North shore of Lake Superior", Canada by Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 172; restricted to "vicinity of Sault Sainte Marie", Michigan, USA, and Ontario, Canada, by Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 75. Cook, 1964, Canad. Field Nat., 78: 191, discussed the type locality and restricted it to "vicinity of Fort William, Ontario", Canada.
Chorophilus septentrionalis Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 335–36. Holotype: BMNH 1850.4.22.8, according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 172, now reregistered as 1936.12.3.121 according to museum records. Type locality: "Great Bear Lake", Northwest Territory, Canada. Synonymy by Smith, 1956, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 69: 171.
Chorophilus nigritus septentrionalis — Dickerson, 1906, The Frog Book: 157.
Pseudacris septentrionalis — Stejneger and Barbour, 1917, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept.: 17.
Hyla septentrionalis — Noble, 1923, Am. Mus. Novit., 70: 5, by implication.
Hyla canadensis Noble, 1923, Am. Mus. Novit., 70: 5. Substitute name for Chorophilus septentrionalis Boulenger, preoccupied in Hyla by Hyla septentrionalis.
Pseudacris nigrita septentrionalis — Wright and Wright, 1933, Handb. Frogs Toads U.S. Canada: 250; Stejneger and Barbour, 1933, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 3: 32.
Pseudacris nigrita maculata — Smith, 1956, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 69: 171.
Pseudacris triseriata maculata — Schwartz, 1957, Am. Mus. Novit., 1838: 11.
Hyla (Pseudacris) triseriata maculata — Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 86.
Pseudacris maculata — Platz, 1989, Copeia, 1989: 709.
Pseudacris (Pseudacris) maculata — Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 350.
Common Names
Boreal Chorus Frog (Stebbins, 1966, Field Guide W. North Am. Rept. Amph.: 67; Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 329; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 12; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 63; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 12; Frost, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2008, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 37: 10; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 7; Frost, McDiarmid, Mendelson, and Green, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 19; Frost, Lemmon, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 18).
Western Marsh Frog (as Pseudacris triseriata sensu lato: Slevin, 1928, Occas. Pap. California Acad. Sci., 16: 118).
Boreal Chorus Frog (Pseudacris nigrita septentrionalis [no longer recognized]: Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 75; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 176).
Distribution
Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan (Canada), and Wisconsin south through Montana and Idaho into the mountains of southeastern Utah, and to northeastern Arizona and northern New Mexico, northern Oklahoma, northwestern Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, and western Indiana; disjunct populations in the Mogollon Rim region of Arizona and adjacent west-central New Mexico as well as in southern Ontario and southern Quebec (Canada) and into adjacent northern New York and northwestern Vermont (USA).
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Canada, United States of America, United States of America - Arizona, United States of America - Colorado, United States of America - Idaho, United States of America - Indiana, United States of America - Iowa, United States of America - Kansas, United States of America - Minnesota, United States of America - Missouri, United States of America - Montana, United States of America - Nebraska, United States of America - New Mexico, United States of America - New York, United States of America - North Dakota, United States of America - Oklahoma, United States of America - South Dakota, United States of America - Utah, United States of America - Vermont, United States of America - Wisconsin, United States of America - Wyoming
Comment
In the Pseudacris nigrita group of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 106. Elevated from subspecies status under Pseudacris triseriata by Platz, 1989, Copeia, 1989: 704–712, on the basis of widespread sympatry and differences in call structure (see Platz and Forester, 1988, Copeia, 1988: 1062–1066). See nomenclatural discussion by Dubois, 1984, Alytes, 3: 86–87. Lemmon, Lemmon, Collins, Lee-Yaw, and Cannatella, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 44: 1068–1082, redelimited the species. Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 1: 371–384, provided an account that summarized the relevant literature. Elliot, Gerhardt, and Davidson, 2009, Frogs and Toads of N. Am.: 94–95, provided an account, photos, and advertisement call. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 210–212, provided an account of larval morphology and biology. Rogic, Tessier, Nöel, Gendron, Branchaud, and Lapointe, 2015, Herpetol. Rev., 46: 1–7, discussed the range in southern Ontario and southern Quebec, Canada, on the basis of calls and mtDNA analysis. Painter, Stuart, Giermakowski, and Pierce, 2017, Western Wildlife, 4: 36, commented on the status and county range in New Mexico, USA. Rogic, Tessier, and Lapointe, 2019, J. Herpetol., 53: 89–95, characterized genetically he populations of southern Ontario and southern Quebec, Canada, for purposes of conservation.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist