- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Smilisca baudinii (Duméril and Bibron, 1841)
Hyla Baudinii Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 564. Holotype: MNHNP 4798, according to Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 160; Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 18. Type locality: "Mexique"; restricted to "Córdoba", Veracruz, Mexico, by Smith and Taylor, 1950, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33: 347; restricted (in error) to "Mexico City" by Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 69. These restrictions invalid according to Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 365, by reason of not being based on disclosed evidence.
Hyla vanvlietii Baird, 1854, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 7: 61. Holotype: Not stated; USNM 3256 (as a 'type' of Smilisca baudini, apparently in error), according to Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 141; this specimen considered a likely syntype of Hyla vanvlietii by Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 60. Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 160, considered USNM 3239 to be the lost holotype. Type locality: "Brownsville, [Cameron County,] Texas", USA. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 371. Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 366, regarded the original publication date to be 1856, but see Fox, 1913, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Index, 1812–1912: vii–xiv.
Hyla vociferans Baird, 1859, Rep. U.S-Mex. Bound. Surv., 2(Pt. 2-Rept.): fig. 11–13. Types: Not stated, although including figured animals in original, presumably originally in ANSP or USNM. Type locality not designated. Synonymy by Cope, 1887, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 32: 13.
Hyla muricolor Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 359. Holotype: likely USNM 25097 (formerly 4818) according to Kellogg, 1932, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 160: 160, and Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 56. Type locality: "[Hacienda] Mirador, Veracruz", Mexico. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 371.
Smilisca daulinia Cope, 1865, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 17: 194. Holotype: "a skeleton in the private anatomical museum of Hyrtl, Professor of Anatomy in the University of Vienna". Type locality: Not designated; designated as "Córdoba", Veracruz, Mexico, by Smith and Taylor, 1950, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33: 347. This restriction invalid due to not being based on disclosed evidence according to Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 366. Synonymy by Cope, 1866, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 85, who suggested that the name "must probably be considered an erroneous orthography of the same [baudini]". Apparently Cope coined the name Smilisca daulinia as a new name even though he had taken the name from a specimen label written by someone else (DRF). See comment by Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 367, who apparently misunderstood what Cope meant by his 1866 statement.
Smilisca baudinii — Cope, 1866, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6: 85.
Smilisca daudinii — Cope, 1871, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 23: 205. Error for Smilisca baudinii.
Smilisca baudinii — Cope, 1875, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 1: 31.
Hyla pansosana Brocchi, 1877, Bull. Soc. Philomath., Paris, Ser. 7, 1: 125. Holotype: MNHNP 6313, according to Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 23. Type locality: "Pansos [= Panzós, Department of Alta Verapaz] (Rio Polochie [= Río Polochic]", Guatemala. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 371.
Hyla (Smilisca) baudini — Sumichrast, 1880, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 5: 190.
Hyla beltrani Taylor, 1942, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28: 306. Holotype: EHT-HMS 29563, by original designation; now UIMNH 25046, according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 176. Type locality: "Tapachula, Chiapas", Mexico. Synonymy by Duellman and Trueb, 1966, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 17: 289.
Smilisca baudini baudini — Smith, 1947, J. Washington Acad. Sci., 37: 408.
Common Names
Van Vliet's Frog (Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 24).
Mexican Tree Frog (Strecker, 1915, Baylor Univ. Bull., 18: 50; Wright and Wright, 1933, Handb. Frogs Toads U.S. Canada: x; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 69).
Tooter (Viosca, 1949, Pop. Sci. Bull., Louisiana Acad. Sci., 1: 10).
Mexican Treefrog (Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 176; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 13; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 14; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 16; Lee, 1996, Amph. Rept. Yucatan Peninsula: 107; Frost, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2008, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 37: 12; Liner and Casas-Andreu, 2008, Herpetol. Circ., 38: 22; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 8; Frost, McDiarmid, Mendelson, and Green, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 21).
Mexican Smilisca (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 69).
Common Mexican Treefrog (Liner, 1994, Herpetol. Circ., 23: 28; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 64; Lee, 2000, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Maya World: 111; Hedges, Powell, Henderson, Hanson, and Murphy, 2019, Caribb. Herpetol., 67: 14).
Baudin's Treefrog (Campbell, 1998, Amph. Rept. N. Guatemala Yucatan Belize: 86).
Distribution
Extreme southern Texas (USA) and southern Sonora and southwestern Chihuahua (Mexico) south (including the Balsas Depression of Mexico) in tropical lowlands to Costa Rica on the Pacific slope; Tres Marias Islands off the coast of Nayarit, Mexico; seemingly introduced into Bexar and Refugio counties in southeast-central Texas, USA. See comment.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, United States of America, United States of America - Texas
Comment
Reviewed by Duellman, 1968, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 59: 1–2, Duellman, 1970, Monogr. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas: 594–598, and Duellman, 2001, Hylid Frogs Middle Am., Ed. 2: 996–997 (who posited that Smilsca baudinii is the sister species of Triprion plus Pternohyla, rendering Smilisca paraphyletic). Lips and Savage, 1996, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 109: 17–26, included this species in a key to the tadpoles found in Costa Rica. See also Lee, 1996, Amph. Rept. Yucatan Peninsula: 107–110, Campbell, 1998, Amph. Rept. N. Guatemala Yucatan Belize: 86–87, and Lee, 2000, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Maya World: 111–114, for accounts. See accounts by Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 349–351, and McCranie and Wilson, 2002, Amph. Honduras: 331–338. Mendoza-Quijano, Mejenes-López, Reynoso-Rosales, Estrada-Hernandez, and Rodriguez-Blanco, 2001, Anal. Inst. Biol., Univ. Nac. Aut. Mexico, Ser. Zool., 72: 233–243, provided a record from Guanajuato. Köhler, Veselý, and Greenbaum, 2005 "2006", Amph. Rept. El Salvador: 50–52, provided an account (for El Salvador) and a color photograph. McCranie, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 38, summarized the departmental distribution in Honduras (see also Smilisca manisorum). Casas-Andreu, 1990, Herpetol. Rev., 21: 38, provided the record for Isla María Madre, Nayarit, Mexico. See comments by Sunyer, Páiz, Dehling, and Köhler, 2009, Herpetol. Notes, 2: 189–202, regarding Nicaraguan populations (see Smilisca manisorum). Lemos-Espinal, 2007, Anf. Rept. Chihuahua Mexico: 48–49, provided an account for Chihuahua, Mexico. Lemos-Espinal and Smith, 2007, Anf. Rept. Coahuila México: 46–47, provided an account for Coahuila, Mexico. Valdes-Lares, Martín-Muñoz de Cote, and Muñiz-Martínez, 2013, Herpetol. Rev., 44: 648, provided new records for Durango, Mexico. Malone, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 489–491, and Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 1: 431–435, provided accounts that summarized the relevant literature and range. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 265–268, provided a brief summary of natural history and identification key for the species of Smilisca in Central America and provided a range map and photograph for this species (in the sense of including Smilisca manisorum). Elliot, Gerhardt, and Davidson, 2009, Frogs and Toads of N. Am.: 124–125, provided an account, photos, and advertisement call. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 212–213, provided an account of larval morphology and biology. Nolasco Luna, López Luna, Cupul Magaña, and Escobedo Galván, 2016, Cienc. Mar., 20 (58): 29–33, reported the species from María Cleofas in the Tres Marías Islands, Nayarit, Mexico. Records from the Atlantic versant from northeastern Honduras, eastern Nicaragua, and eastern Costa Rica apparently all can be referred to Smilisca manisorum, although the contact zones of Smilisca baudini and Smilisca baudini has been incompletely elucidated. Lemos-Espinal, Smith, and Valdes-Lares, 2019, Amph. Rept. Durango: 71–72, provided a brief account for Durango, Mexico. Lemos-Espinal and Dixon, 2016, Amph. Rept. Hidalgo: 380–381, provided a brief account and map for Hidalgo, Mexico. Rorabaugh and Lemos-Espinal, 2016, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Sonora: 164–166, provided a detailed account of natural history, morphology, distribution, and conservation status in Sonora, Mexico. Found on Islas Maria Madre and María Cleofas in the Tres Marias Archipelago of Nayarit, Mexico, according to Nolasco Luna, Barraza-Soltero, López-Montes, Moreno-López, and Escobedo Galván, 2022, Check List, 18: 244. Tepos-Ramírez, Garduño-Fonseca, Peralta-Robles, García-Rubio, and Cervantes Jiménez, 2023, Check List, 19: 269–292, discussed the distribution and conservation status of the species in Queretaro, Mexico. Bassett, 2023, Reptiles & Amphibians, 30(e18486): 1–18, provided an updated county distribution map for Texas, USA. Martínez-Fonseca, Holmes, Sunyer, Westeen, Grundler, Cerda, Fernández-Mena, Loza-Molina, Monagan, Nondorf, Pandelis, and Rabosky, 2024, Check List, 20: 64, provided and discussed a record from Las Brisas del Mogotón, Departamento Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua. Loc-Barragán, Smith, Woolrich-Piña, and Lemos-Espinal, 2024, Herpetozoa, Wien, 37: 30, reported on the distributional and conservation status in the state of Nayarit, Mexico.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.