Hyloscirtus phyllognathus (Melin, 1941)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Hylidae > Genus: Hyloscirtus > Species: Hyloscirtus phyllognathus

Hyla phyllognatha Melin, 1941, Göteborgs K. Vetensk. Vitterh. Samh. Handl., Ser. B, 1: 30. Holotype: NHMG 474, according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 83. Type locality: "Roque, [Departamento San Martín,] Perú".

Hyloscirtus phyllognathusFaivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 85.

Boana phyllognathaWiens, Fetzner, Parkinson, and Reeder, 2005, Syst. Biol., 54: 743, by implication.

Common Names

Yellow-footed Stream Frog (Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 2: xxxiii). 

Rana Torrentícola de Pies Amarillos (Spanish: Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 2: xxxiii).

Roque Treefrog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 57).

Distribution

Amazonian slopes of Andes in Peru, up to 2190 m elevation; unnamed or misidentified populations in Ecuador and Colombia have been assigned to this species (see comment). 

Geographic Occurrence

Natural Resident: Peru

Likely/Controversially Present: Colombia, Ecuador

Endemic: Peru

Comment

See Duellman, 1972, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 11: 1–31. See account by Ruiz-Carranza and Lynch, 1982, Caldasia, 13: 658–659. In the Hyloscirtus bogotensis group of Faivovich, Haddad, Garcia, Frost, Campbell, and Wheeler, 2005, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 294: 84–85. Mueses-Cisneros, 2005, Caldasia, 27: 235, provided a record for Putumayo, Colombia. In Hyloscirtus species group B of Sánchez, 2010, Copeia, 2010: 351–363. Acosta-Galvis, 2017, Biota Colomb., 18: 282–315, reported the species from the Municipality of Yopal, Casanare Department, Colombia. See brief account (as Hyloscirtus aff. phyllognathus) for the Manu region, Peru, by Villacampa-Ortega, Serrano-Rojas, and Whitworth, 2017, Amph. Manu Learning Cent.: 154–155, and suggested that this segment of the range is an unnamed species. Varela-Jaramillo, Streicher, Venegas, and Ron, 2025, ZooKeys, 1231: 233–292, suggested that records from Ecuador (and by extension Colombia) are based on misidentifications. Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 2: 431–433, provided an account of this nominal species in Ecuador, with photographs, which summarized identification, adult and larval morphology, systematics, natural history, distribution (including a dot map), conservation, and (on p. 587) the advertisement call.

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.