Pseudis limellum (Cope, 1862)

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Hylidae > Genus: Pseudis > Species: Pseudis limellum

Lysapsus limellum Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 155. Holotype: "Mus. Smithsonian [USNM] (No. 5495)"; now lost according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 197. Type locality: "Paraguay. Taken on _____ river". Corrected to Río Curumba, Paraguay [= Corumbá, on Rio Paraguai, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil] by Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 351.

Hyla quadrilineata Steindachner, 1864, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 14: 262. Nomen nudum. Coined as a synonym of Lysapsus limellum and attributed to Natterer.

Podonectes palmatus Steindachner, 1864, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 14: 262. Nomen nudum provided originally as a synonym of Pseudis minuta and attributed to Fitzinger. (Savage and Carvalho, 1953, Zoologica, New York, 38: 194, placed Podonectes palmatus in the synonymy of Lysapsus limellum based on examination of Steindachner's illustrations, specimens of Lysapsus limellum Cope, which must be considered to be types.)

Lisapsus limellumSteindachner, 1867, Reise Österreichischen Fregatte Novara, Zool., Amph.: 50. Incorrect subsequent spelling.

Pseudis limellumBoulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 187; Berg, 1896, An. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Buenos Aires, 5: 161; Aguiar, Bacci, Lima, Rossa-Feres, Haddad, and Recco-Pimentel, 2007, Cladistics, 23: 462; Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5:440; Caballero-Gini, Brusquetti, Bueno-Villafañe, Quinteros-Muñoz, Jairam, Rodrigues, Haddad, Fernández Ríos, and Baldo, 2024, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 202: 1–13.

Lysapsus limellusSavage and Carvalho, 1953, Zoologica, New York, 38: 194; Incorrect subsequent spelling of the species name, a noun in apposition.

Lysapsus limellus limellusGallardo, 1961, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 125: 126.

Common Names

Uruguay Harlequin Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 97).

Distribution

Extreme northwestern Uruguay, Paraguay, southeastern to north-western Bolivia, and northern Argentina, and throughout the Paraná and Amazon River basins of Brazil.

Geographic Occurrence

Natural Resident: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay

Comment

Tadpole morphology described by Kehr and Basso, 1990, Copeia, 1990: 573–575. See comment by De la Riva, Köhler, Lötters, and Reichle, 2000, Rev. Esp. Herpetol., 14: 51-52, who discussed taxonomic confusion in Bolivia and the likelihood of this nominal species being a composite. Achaval and Olmos, 2003, Anf. Rept. Uruguay, ed. 2: 36, provided a brief account and photograph for the Uruguay population. Brusquetti and Lavilla, 2006, Cuad. Herpetol., 20: 10, briefly discussed the range in Paraguay. Vera Candioti, 2007, Zootaxa, 1600: 1–175, reported on detailed larval morphology. Garda, Santana, and São Pedro, 2010, Zootaxa, 2666: 1-28, reported on morphology, morphometrics, and range of the species in Brazil, including a dot map. França and Venâncio, 2010, Biotemas, 23: 71–84, provided a record for the municipality of Boca do Acre, Amazonas, with a brief discussion of the range; presumably these specimens have been reidentified. Santana, Queiroz, Wanderley, São Pedro, Leite, and Garda, 2013, Amphibia-Reptilia, 34: 201–215, reported on tadpole morphology and advertisement call. Weiler, Núñez, Airaldi, Lavilla, Peris, and Baldo, 2013, Anf. Paraguay: 69, provided a brief account, image, and dot map for Paraguay. Affonso, Cafofo, Delariva, Karling, and Lourenço-de-Moraes, 2014, Check List, 10: 878–882, provided a record for the state of Paraná, Brazil. See account by Maneyro, Langone, and Carreira, 2019, in Maneyro, Langone, and Carreira (eds.), Libro Rojo Anf. Rept. Uruguay: 59–63, for Uruguay. Laufer, Gobel, Kacevas, Lado, Cortizas, Carabio, Arrieta, Prigioni, Borteiro, and Kolenc, 2021, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 15 (2: e290): 228–237, provided new records for Uruguay and discussed conservation status. Caballero-Gini, Brusquetti, Bueno-Villafañe, Quinteros-Muñoz, Jairam, Rodrigues, Haddad, Fernández Ríos, and Baldo, 2024, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 202: 1–13, reported on molecular phylogenetics, placed this species in their Pseudis limellum clade, and provided a polygon range map. Ocampo, Aparicio, Bernal Hoverud, Domic, and Wallace, 2024, Herpetol. Notes, 17: 371–389, reported the species (as Lysapsus limellum) and its habitat in Madidi National Park, La Paz, Bolivia. Rivas, Wallace, and Callapa, 2025, Reptiles & Amphibians, 32(e21473): 1–10, reported the species (as Lysapsus limellum) from the Great Tectonic Lakes of Exaltación region, Beni, Bolivia. Ferraro and Bonino, 2025, Rev. Latinoam. Herpetol., 8: 170–191, provided a dot map for Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. Costa, Muller, Silva Alves Saccol, and Santos, 2026, Check List, 22: 237–241, reported the first specimens from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 41 years, and provided an update dot map of the distribution of the species. Núñez, Zárate-Betzel, Ortíz, Salinas, Piris da Motta, Mendoza, and Duré, 2026, Rev. Soc. Cient. Paraguay, 31(e3101): 1–12, reported briefly on the distribution in wetlands within the Department of Ñeembucú, Paraguay. Verrastro and Borges-Martins, 2025, Anf. Rept. Pampa, 2: 61, provided a brief account, photograph, and dot distribution map for the Pampa biome in Brazil (as well as adjacent areas of Uruguay and Argentina).

  

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.