- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hylambates boulengeri (Perret, 1986)
Phlyctimantis boulengeri Perret, 1986, Bull. Soc. Neuchatel. Sci. Nat., 109: 23. Holotype: MHNG 2238.56, by original designation. Type locality: "Fainchang (Fineschang), région de Mamfe, Cameroun occidental, 150 m. Forêt dense humide sempervirente".
Hylambates boulengeri — Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 223.
Common Names
Boulenger's Striped Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 69).
Distribution
Disjunct distribution in the Ivory Coast, southeastern Guinea, Liberia, and southern Ghana, and again from southeastern Nigeria and western Cameroon to Gabon (see comment); Bioko and probably in mainland Equatorial Guinea. See comment.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Cameroon, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria
Likely/Controversially Present: Equatorial Guinea
Comment
Confused with Phlyctimantis leonardi by many authors previous to its description (Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 317). The distinctiveness of Phlyctimantis boulengeri from Phlyctimantis leondardi has been questioned by Largen and Dowsett-Lemaire, 1991, Tauraco Res. Rept., 4: 151-152. Gabon record by Lötters, Gossmann, Obame, and Böhme, 2001, Herpetofauna, Weinstadt, 23: 32. Rödel and Branch, 2002, Salamandra, 38: 260, suggested that this name might cover more than one species. Köhler, Scheelke, Schick, Veith, and Lötters, 2005, Afr. Zool., 40: 139-141, discussed advertisement calls and confusion with Phylyctimantis leonardi. Rödel, Gil, Agyei, Leaché, Diaz, Fujita, and Ernst, 2005, Salamandra, 41: 107-127, reported Phlyctimantis cf. boulengeri from Ghana. Amiet, 2007, Rev. Suisse Zool., 114: 87-126, discussed this species in Cameroon. Onadeko and Rödel, 2009, Salamandra, 45: 1-14, suggested that the two distributional blocks probably represent different species. Hillers, Ofori-Boateng, Segniagbeto, Agyei, and Rödel, 2009, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 85: 127-141, provided new records in central Ghana. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 245–246, provided information on comparative larval morphology. Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 317–319, provided a brief account and map. Dewynter, Chirio, Melki, Cordier, and Frétey, 2017, Cah. Fondation Biotope, 11: 21, provided a brief account and photographs of this species from the Mount Koumouna-Bouali area of Gabon. Dewynter and Frétey, 2019, Cah. Fondation Biotope, 27: 30, suggested on the basis of evidence published by Deichmann, Mulcahy, Vanthomme, Tobi, Wynn, Zimkus, and McDiarmid, 2017, PLoS One, 12 (11: e0187283): 19, briefly discussed the issue and suggested that all records from Gabon could be referred to Phlyctimantis leonardi. As the ranges seem to be highly provisional, it seems that the ranges of and the boundary between and the populations within Phlyctimantis leonardi and Phlyctimantis boulengeri need to be assayed at a molecular basis to determine how many lineages and the ranges that compose both nominal species (DRF). Rödel and Glos, 2019, Zoosyst. Evol., 95: 24, reported this species from the Foya Proposed Protected Area in western Liberia. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 132–133, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Sánchez-Vialas, Calvo-Revuelta, Castroviejo-Fisher, and De la Riva, 2020, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 66: 146, considered the species of problematic taxonomic status but a possible member of the Equatorial Guinea fauna.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.