- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Leptodactylus discodactylus Boulenger, 1884
Leptodactylus discodactylus Boulenger, 1884 "1883", Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1883: 637. Holotype: BMNH 1947.2.17.40 (formerly 1884.2.18.44), according to museum records. Type locality: "Yurimaguas, Huallaga River, [Loreto,] Northern Peru".
Leptodactylus nigrescens Andersson, 1945, Ark. Zool., 37A(2): 57-58. Syntypes: NHRM (3 specimens) by original indication; NHRM unnumbered (largest of syntypes) designated lectotype by Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7. Type locality: "Rio Napo, Watershed, 400 m", Ecuador. Synonymy by Gorham, 1966, Das Tierreich, 85: 132; Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7.
Vanzolinius discodactylus — Heyer, 1974, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 87: 88.
Leptodactylus discodactylus — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 362.
Common Names
Vanzolini's Amazon Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 85).
Distribution
Amazonian Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia; states of Amazonas and Acre, Brazil.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru
Comment
See account (as Leptodactylus discodactylus) by Heyer, 1970, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 191: 7–9. Duellman, 1978, Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 65: 105–106, provided a brief account and characterization larvae and of the call. Rodríguez and Duellman, 1994, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 22: 72–73, provided a brief account for the Iquitos region of northeastern Peru. See also Gascon, Lougheed, and Bogart, 1996, Biotropica, 28: 376–387, for discussion of apparent lack of geographic variation. This followed by Heyer, 1997, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 110: 338–365, who discussed goegraphic variation in color pattern, morphology, and call structure. Most closely related to Adenomera and Lithodytes, according to Heyer, 1975, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 199. Heyer, 1998, Alytes, 16: 1–24, presented evidence to place Vanzolinius deeply within a paraphyletic Leptodactylus, and likely the sister taxon of Leptodactylus diedrus. Köhler and Lötters, 1999, Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 48: 259–273, provided the Bolivian record. In the Leptodactylus melanonotus species group of de Sá, Grant, Camargo, Heyer, Ponssa, and Stanley, 2014, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 9(Spec. Issue 1): 1–123, and who provided a summary of relevant literature (adult and larval morphology, identification, advertisement call, and range) on pp. 73–74, although they excluded Bolivia from the range without discussion. Metcalf, Marsh, Torres Pacaya, Graham, and Gunnels, 2020, Herpetol. Notes, 13: 753–767, reported the species from the Santa Cruz Forest Reserve, Loreto, northeastern Peru. Carvalho, Fouquet, Lyra, Giaretta, Costa-Campos, Rodrigues, Haddad, and Ron, 2022, Syst. Biodiversity, 20 (1: 2089269): 1–31, reported on the systematics, phylogenetics, and advertisement call. Gagliardi-Urrutia, García Dávila, Jaramillo-Martinez, Rojas-Padilla, Rios-Alva, Aguilar-Manihuari, Pérez-Peña, Castroviejo-Fisher, Simões, Estivals, Guillen Huaman, Castro Ruiz, Angulo Chávez, Mariac, Duponchelle, and Renno, 2022, Anf. Loreto: 142–143, provided a brief account, photograph, dot map, and genetic barcode for Loreto, Peru. Crnobrna, Santa-Cruz Farfan, Gallegos, López-Rojas, Llanqui, Panduro Pisco, and Kelsen Arbaiza, 2023, Check List, 19: 445, provided a record from Ucayali Department, central-eastern Peru.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For additional information specific to Ecuador see FaunaWebEcuador: Anfibios del Ecuador
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.