Leptodactylus labrosus Jiménez de la Espada, 1875

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Leptodactylidae > Subfamily: Leptodactylinae > Genus: Leptodactylus > Species: Leptodactylus labrosus

Leptodactylus labrosus Jiménez de la Espada, 1875, Vert. Viaje Pacif. Verif. 1862–1865: 36. Syntypes: MNCN (unnumbered), the only surviving specimen according to Heyer and Peters, 1971, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 84: 164, who designated this specimen lectotype; now numbered MNCN 3524 according to González-Fernández, García-Díez, and San Segundo, 2009, Spixiana, München, 32: 273. Type locality: "Pimocha, [Guayas Province,] orillas del Rio Daule (Ecuador)".

Leptodactylus curtus Barbour and Noble, 1920, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 63: 405-406. Holotype: MCZ 5281, by original designation. Type locality: "Bellavista, Cajamarca, Peru". Synonymy by Heyer and Peters, 1971, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 84: 163-170.

Common Names

Thick-lipped Thin-toed Frog (Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 4: xxx). 

Rana Dedilarga de Labio Grueso (Spanish: Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 4: xxx).

Pimocha White-lipped Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 81).

Distribution

Coastal Pacific lowlands of western Ecuador (Esperaldas, Pichincha, Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Manabi, Los Ríos, Santa Elena, Guayas, Cañar, El Oro, and Loja provinces) to coastal central Peru (Cajamarca, Libertad, and Ancash departments).

Geographic Occurrence

Natural Resident: Ecuador, Peru

Comment

In the Leptodactylus fuscus group of Heyer, 1978, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 29: 1–85. Lehr, Köhler, and Streit, 2002, Faun. Abh. Staatl. Mus. Tierkd., Dresden, 22: 379, discussed range in Peru. Cisneros-Heredia, 2006, Zool. Res., Kunming, 27: 225–234, discussed range in Ecuador. Carvalho and Ron, 2011, Herpetol. Notes, 4: 325–326, described the advertisement call. In the Leptodactylus fuscus species group of de Sá, Grant, Camargo, Heyer, Ponssa, and Stanley, 2014, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 9(Spec. Issue 1): 1–123, and who provided a summary of relevant literature (adult and larval morphology, identification, advertisement call, and range) on pp. 36. Koch, Venegas, Santa-Cruz Farfan, and Böhme, 2018, Zootaxa, 4385: 32–33, commented on distribution and natural history in the Marañon Valley region of Peru. Armijos-Ojeda, Székely, Székely, Cogǎlniceanu, Cisneros-Heredia, Ordóñez-Delgado, Escudero, and Espinosa, 2021, ZooKeys, 1063: 38, provided a dot map. Coloma and Duellman, 2025, Amph. Ecuador. Vol. 4: 74–77, provided an account, with photographs, which summarized identification, adult and larval morphology, systematics, natural history, distribution (including a dot map for Ecuador), conservation, and (on p. 385) vocalization.

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.