- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Phrynomantis bifasciatus (Smith, 1847)
Brachymerus bifasciatus Smith, 1847, Illust. Zool. S. Afr., 3 (Part 26): pl. 63. Type(s): Not traced; Smith's material in BMNH may be syntypes although they do not correspond exactly with the description, according to Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 513. Type locality: "country to the east and north-east of the Cape Colony .... [for example:] On the banks of the Limpopo River, close to the tropic of Capricorn", Limpopo Province, Rep. South Africa.
Dendrobates inhambanensis Bianconi, 1849 "1848", Nuovi Ann. Sci. Nat., Bologna, Ser. 2, 10: 107. Syntypes: MZUB 100177, 100177a, according to Bonfitto, 1991, Boll. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 9: 366. Type locality: "Mozambico"; restricted to "Inhambane, Mozambico" by Bonfitto, 1991, Boll. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 9: 366. Synonymy by Peters, 1882, Naturwiss. Reise Mossambique, Zool. 3: 172.
Bombinator (Brachymerus) bifasciatus — Schlegel, 1858, Handl. Dierkd., 2: 58.
Phrynomantis bifasciata — Peters, 1867, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1867: 35; Cope, 1867, J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Ser. 2, 6:192; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 172.
Phrynomerus bifasciatus — Noble, 1926, Am. Mus. Novit., 237: 3; Power, 1927, Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr., 14: 415
Phrynomerus bifasciatus nyasalandensis Hoffman, 1944, Soöl. Navors. Nas. Mus. Bloemfontein, 1: 181. Holotype: NMB A2633, by original designation. Type locality: "Chitiala [= Chitala River], Nyasaland", Malawi, according to Loveridge, 1953, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 110: 395; Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 513, who considered this a synonym of Phrynomantis bifasciatus bifasciatus (following Loveridge, 1953, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 110: 329).
Phrynomerus bifasciatus bifasciatus — Loveridge, 1953, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 110: 329, 395.
Phrynomantis bifasciatus — Dubois, 1988, Alytes, 7: 1–5.
Common Names
Red-banded Rubber Frog (Pienaar, 1963, Koedoe, 6: 81; Lambiris, 1990 "1989", Monogr. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino, 10: 75; Spawls, Mazuch, and Mohammad, 2023, Handb. Amph. Rept. NE Afr.: 53).
Two-striped Frog (Wood, 1863, Illust. Nat. Hist., 3: 175).
Red-banded Frog (Wager, 1965, Frogs S. Afr.: 126; Broadley, 1971, Puku, 6: 111; Broadley, 1973, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 10: 22; Broadley, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 33; Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 15; Passmore and Carruthers, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 19: 4; Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 108).
Two-banded Frog (Van Dijk, 1978, J. Herpetol. Assoc. Afr., 17: 15).
Banded Rubber Frog (Passmore and Carruthers, 1979, S. Afr. Frogs: 108; Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 234-235; Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 228; Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 288).
South African Snake-necked Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 91).
Distribution
Extreme southern coastal Somalia, southern Kenya, and Dem. Rep. Congo (Katanga Province) to northeastern Rep. South Africa and northern Namibia, northern and eastern Botswana and and southwestern Angola; eastern lowlands of Rwanda.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Angola, Botswana, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Eswatini, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Rwanda, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Comment
See comment under Phrynomantis microps. See Poynton and Broadley, 1985, Ann. Natal Mus., 26: 513-514 (as Phrynomerus microps), and Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 234-235. Auerbach, 1987, Amph. Rept. Botswana: 39, provided a summary account and grid map for Botswana. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 228-230, Du Preez, 2004, in Minter et al. (eds.), Atlas Frogs S. Afr. Lesotho and Swaziland: 199-201, Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 64-66, and Du Preez and Carruthers, 2009, Compl. Guide Frogs S. Afr.: 288-289, provided accounts. Mercurio, 2011, Amph. Malawi: 216-217, provided an account for Malawi. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 254–255, provided information on comparative larval morphology. Harper, Measey, Patrick, Menegon, and Vonesh, 2010, Field Guide Amph. E. Arc Mts. Tanzania and Kenya: 224–2225, provided a brief account and photograph. Du Preez and Carruthers, 2017, Frogs S. Afr., Compl. Guide: 310–311, provided an account, including a polygon range map for southern Africa, photograph, identification features, adult and larval morphology, habitat, and call. Ohler and Frétey, 2014, J. E. Afr. Nat. Hist., 103: 91, provided a brief note of a collection from northern Mozambique. Marques, Ceríaco, Blackburn, and Bauer, 2018, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 65 (Suppl. II): 80–81, provided a map for Angola and provided a brief account. Phaka, Netherlands, Kruger, and Du Preez, 2017, Bilingual Field Guide Frogs Zululand: 49, provided a photograph, Zululand regional map, and a brief account of life history and identification. Spawls, Wasonga, and Drewes, 2019, Amph. Kenya: 29, provided a range map for Kenya, photograph, and brief characterization. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 108–109, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Baptista, António, and Branch, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (e203): 96–130, reported on specimens from Bicuar National Park, southwestern Angola. Dehling and Sinsch, 2023, Diversity, 15 (512): 1–81, discussed the range, identification, natural history, advertisement call, and conservation status in Rwanda. Becker and Channing, 2024, Afr. J. Herpetol., 73: 105–117, described the advertisement call, provided range extensions, and a dot and polygon distribution map. Spawls, Mazuch, and Mohammad, 2023, Handb. Amph. Rept. NE Afr.: 53, provided an account addressing identification, natural history, conservation status, and range, including a polygon map.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.