- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Phrynobatrachus calcaratus (Peters, 1863)
Hemimantis calcaratus Peters, 1863, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1863: 451. Syntypes: ZMB 4923 and 52358, according to Bauer, Günther, and Klipfel, 1995, in Bauer et al. (eds.), Herpetol. Contr. W.C.H. Peters: 49. Type locality: "Boutry", Ghana. Placed on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology by Opinion 1921, Anonymous, 1999, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 56: 96-100.
Arthroleptis calcarata — Peters, 1875, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1875: 210. .
Arthroleptis calcaratus — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 118.
Hyperolius (Arthroleptis) calcaratus — Knauer, 1878, Naturgesch. Lurche: 111.
Pseudarthroleptis calcaratus — Deckert, 1938, Sitzungsber. Ges. Naturforsch. Freunde Berlin, 1938: 158.
Phrynobatrachus (Pararthroleptis) calcaratus — Laurent, 1941, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 34: 206.
Phrynobatrachus calcaratus — Guibé and Lamotte, 1958, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 53: 257. Guibé and Lamotte, 1963, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 66: 601-627
Common Names
Boutry River Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 103).
Peters' Puddle Frog (Jacobsen, 2009, Afr. Herp News, 47: 5).
Distribution
Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, and Liberia to Nigeria and through Cameroon to east-central Central African Republic and Bioko I. (Equatorial Guinea), below 1200 m elevation; expected in Gambia and Sierra Leone.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Benin, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal, Togo
Likely/Controversially Present: Gambia, Sierra Leone
Comment
Reviewed by Guibé and Lamotte, 1963, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 66: 601–627; and Perret, 1988, Arch. Sci., Genève, 41: 277–279. Rödel, 2000, Herpetofauna W. Afr., 1: 176–180, provided an account. Schiøtz, 1963, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., 125: 46–47, provided records for Nigeria. Emms, Jambang, Bah, Mankali, Rödel, and Barnett, 2005, Herpetol. Bull., London, 94: 6–16, provided a record for this or a very similar species from Gambia. Pauwels and Rödel, 2007, Herpetozoa, Wien, 19: 135–148, did not note this species as occurring in Gabon. Rödel, Brede, Schiefenhövel, Penner, Sinsin, and Nago, 2007, Salamandra, 43: 231–238, reported this species from the Lama Forest of southern Benin. Frétey, 2008, Alytes, 25: 99–172, summarized the literature. Hillers, Ofori-Boateng, Segniagbeto, Agyei, and Rödel, 2009, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 85: 127–141, suggested that the name of this taxon covers a species complex. Jacobsen, 2009, Afr. Herp News, 47: 2–20, reported this species from east-north-central Central African Republic. In species group B of Zimkus, Rödel, and Hillers, 2010, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 55: 883–900, who noted this nominal species is a complex. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 275–276, provided information on comparative larval morphology. Auliya, Wagner, and Böhme, 2012, Bonn Zool. Bull., 61: 255–281, reported the species from the Bijagós Archipelago, Guinea-Bissau. Rödel and Glos, 2019, Zoosyst. Evol., 95: 24, reported this species from the Krahn-Bassa Proposed Protected Area in southeastern Liberia and commented on identification and habitat preference. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 298–299, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. See brief account and range map for Equatorial Guinea in Sánchez-Vialas, Calvo-Revuelta, Castroviejo-Fisher, and De la Riva, 2020, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 66: 137–230. In the Phrynobatrachus calcaratus group of Goutte, Reyes-Velasco, and Boissinot, 2019, ZooKeys, 824: 53–70. Segniagbeto, Ohler, Rödel, Luiselli, and Dubois, 2024, Zoosystema, 46: 651–652, provided a brief account for Togo, discussing habitat, distribution, conservation status, and identification.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist