- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Xenopus tropicalis (Gray, 1864)
Silurana tropicalis Gray, 1864, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, 14: 316. Syntypes: Not stated, but BMNH 1947.2.24.83–86 (formerly 1864.9.22.1–4) recorded as syntypes in museum records. BMNH 1947.2.24.83, designated lectotype by Evans, Carter, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Kelley, McLaughlin, Pauwels, Portik, Stanley, Tinsley, Tobias, and Blackburn, 2015, PLoS One, 10(12): e0142823: 21. Type locality: "West Africa, Lagos", Nigeria.
Silurana intertropicalis — Günther, 1865, Zool. Rec., 1: 127. Misspelling.
Xenopus tropicalis — Müller, 1910, Abh. Math. Physik. Cl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., 24: 625; Pauly, Hillis, and Cannatella, 2009, Herpetologica, 65: 126.
Silurana tropicalis — Cannatella and Trueb, 1988, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 94: 1–38; Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 290; Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 413.
Xenopus (Silurana) tropicalis — Kobel, Loumont, and Tinsley, 1996, in Tinsley and Kobel (eds.), Biol. Xenopus: 21; Kobel, Barandun, and Thiebaud, 1998, Herpetol. J., 8: 13.
Common Names
Tropical Clawed Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 96; Evans, Carter, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Kelley, McLaughlin, Pauwels, Portik, Stanley, Tinsley, Tobias, and Blackburn, 2015, PLoS One, 10(12): e0142823: 28).
Forest Clawed Frog (Barnett, Emms, and Santoni, 2001, Herpetol. Bull., London, 77: 8).
Distribution
Forested West Africa from Sierra Leone and Senegal at least to Burkina Faso and western Cameroon; expected in southern Mali; introduced population in Riverview, Hillsborough County, Florida, USA.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo
Likely/Controversially Present: Mali
Introduced: United States of America, United States of America - Florida
Comment
Evans, Carter, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Kelley, McLaughlin, Pauwels, Portik, Stanley, Tinsley, Tobias, and Blackburn, 2015, PLoS One, 10(12): e0142823: 21–22, provided an account within a larger revision of the genus that redelimited the species and therefore rendered all previous literature, following, of arguable assignment to species. Loumont, 1983, Rev. Suisse Zool., 90: 176, restricted Xenopus tropicalis to the west of tropical Africa only, and considered that records to the south and east (including the Congo Basin) belong to Xenopus epitropicalis. Synonymy includes Xenopus calcaratus. Most primitive of the Xenopus species, set apart from the rest of the genus by chromosome number (2n=20) (Tymowska, 1973, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 12: 298), osteology (Estes, 1975, Herpetologica, 31: 269), serum albumins (Bisbee, Baker, Wilson, Hadji-Azimi, and Fischberg, 1977, Science, 195: 785–787), and other characters (Tinsley, 1981, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Suppl., 15: 140). Rödel, 2000, Herpetofauna W. Afr., 1: 36–41, provided an account. Rödel and Branch, 2002, Salamandra, 38: 251, reported the species in Ivory Coast. Schiøtz, 1963, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., 125: 14, provided records for Nigeria. Emms, Jambang, Bah, Mankali, Rödel, and Barnett, 2005, Herpetol. Bull., London, 94: 6–16, provided records for Gambia. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 290, provided information on comparative larval morphology (as Silurana tropicalis). Rödel and Glos, 2019, Zoosyst. Evol., 95: 18, reported this species from the Krahn-Basa Proposed Protected Area in southeastern Liberia and the Foya Proposed Protected Area in western Liberia. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 42–43, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Zattera, Gazolla, Soares, Gazoni, Pollet, Recco-Pimentel, and Bruschi, 2020, Frontiers in Genetics, 11(637): 1–10, reported on karyology. Ayoro, Segniagbeto, Hema, Penner, Oueda, Dubois, Rödel, Kabré, and Ohler, 2020, Zoosystema, 42: 547–582, discussed records, identification, and habitat in Burkina Faso. Sánchez-Vialas, Calvo-Revuelta, Castroviejo-Fisher, and De la Riva, 2020, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 66: 137–230, excluded this species from the fauna of Equatorial Guinea. Goodman, Jongsma, Hill, Stanley, Tuckett, Blackburn, and Romagosa, 2021, J. Herpetol., 55: 62–69, discussed the genetics and morphology of the introduced population in Hillsborough County, Florida, USA. Kanga, Kouamé, Zogbass, Gongomin, Agoh, Kouamé, Konan, Adepo-Gourène, Gourène, and Rödel, 2021, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 15: 71–107, commented on conservation status, identification, range, and habitat on the Ivory Coast side of Mont Nimba. Kako-Wanzalire, Mongo, Ilonga, Mapoli, Mbumba, Neema, Tungaluna, Itoka, and Bogaert, 2021, Tropicultura, 39 (1: 1709): 1–19, briefly discussed habitat preference in northeastern Dem. Rep. Congo, but the identification is doubtful. Gansa, Agadjihouèdé, and Hounkanrin, 2023, Afr. Zool., 58: 39–56, reported the species from the lower Ouémé Valley, southeastern Benin, and briefly descried habitat preference. Segniagbeto, Ohler, Rödel, Luiselli, and Dubois, 2024, Zoosystema, 46: 655, provided a brief account for Togo, discussing habitat, distribution, conservation status, and identification.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist