- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Xenopus wittei Tinsley, Kobel, and Fischberg, 1979
Xenopus wittei Tinsley, Kobel, and Fischberg, 1979, J. Zool., London, 188: 73. Holotype: BMNH 1977.2039, by original designation. Type locality: "Chelima Forest (waterhole alongside Kabale—Rutenga road), Kigezi District, S.W. Uganda; alt. 2200 m. 1° 04′ S, 29° 55′ E".
Xenopus (Xenopus) wittei — Kobel, Barandun, and Thiebaud, 1998, Herpetol. J., 8: 13.
Common Names
Witte's Clawed Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 97).
De Witte's Clawed Frog (Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 246).
Distribution
Highland swamps and lakes bordering the Western Rift in southwestern Uganda, western Rwanda, Burundi, and the Kahuzi-Biega and Lubero Highlands, eastern Dem. Rep Congo, 1200 to 2300 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Burundi, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Rwanda, Uganda
Comment
Specimens mentioned as Xenopus (laevis) bunyoniensis by Tymowska and Fischberg, 1973, Chromosoma, Berlin, 44: 337, are of this species. Closely related to Xenopus vestitus with similar karyotypes (2n=72); Tinsley, Kobel, and Fischberg, 1979, J. Zool., London, 188: 95, suggested that they share an allopolyploid origin with one ancestor in common. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 246-257, provided an account. Evans, Greenbaum, Chifundera, Carter, Tobias, Mendel, and Kelley, 2011, J. Zool., London, 283: XXX, commented on the range. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 299–300, provided information on comparative larval morphology. In the Xenopus amieti group of Evans, Carter, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Kelley, McLaughlin, Pauwels, Portik, Stanley, Tinsley, Tobias, and Blackburn, 2015, PLoS One, 10(12): e0142823: 29. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 48–49, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Dehling and Sinsch, 2023, Diversity, 15 (512): 1–81, discussed the range, identification, natural history, advertisement call, and conservation status in Rwanda. Behangana, Byaruhanga, Magala, Katumba, Kagurusi, Dendi, and Luiselli, 2023, Wetlands, 43(88): 1–13, reported on presence in the wetlands of southwestern Uganda.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.