- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Boreorana sylvatica (LeConte, 1825)
Rana canagica Pallas, 1814 "1831", Zoograph. Rosso-Asiat. Sist. Omn. Animal.: 12. Types: Not mentioned, although presumably originally in ZISP. Type locality: "insulis Aleuticis inter Camtschatcam et Americam, et in hujus Continentis parte a Rossis occupato observait". Synonymy with Rana sylvatica by Lindholm, 1924, Copeia, 129: 46–47. This disputed by Myers, 1930, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 43: 62, who placed it as a senior synonym of Bufo boreas (but subsequent authors have not accepted this as evidenced by inaction).
Rana sylvatica LeConte, 1825, Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, 1: 282. Type(s): Not known to exist. Type locality: Not stated; designated as "vicinity of New York", USA, by Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 81.
Rana pennsylvanica Harlan, 1825, Am. J. Sci. Arts, 10: 58. Types: Not designated although presumably originally in ANSP. Type locality: "Inhabit Pennsylvania and New-Jersey", USA. Described as a junior synonym of Rana sylvatica. Synonymy by Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 363; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 47; Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 441; Boulenger, 1920, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 55: 458.
Rana pensylvanica — Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 363. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Rana pennsylvanica Harlan, 1825.
Rana cantabrigensis Baird, 1854, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 7: 62. Types: MCZ (not located with certainty, according to Barbour and Loveridge, 1929, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 69: 327. Type locality: "Cambridge, Mass. (Collection of Prof. Agassiz)"; in error according to Howe, 1899, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 28: 369, who presumed that it came "probably from the west or northwest of North America, and Cambridge, Mass., the habitat given, probably arose from the specimen being in the collection of Profesor Agassiz"; corrected to "Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan", Canada, by Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 81. Synonymy by Günther, 1859 "1858", Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus.: 17; Jordan, 1878, Man. Vert. North. U.S., Ed. 2: 188; Boulenger, 1879, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 4: 174. Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 429, regarded the original publication date to be 1856, but see Fox, 1913, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Index, 1812–1912: vii–xiv.
Rana temporaria var. silvatica — Günther, 1859 "1858", Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus.: 17.
Rana temporaria cantabrigensis — Cope, 1875, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 1: 32.
Rana temporaria silvatica — Cope, 1875, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 1: 32.
Rana temporaria var. sylvatica — Jordan, 1878, Man. Vert. North. U.S., Ed. 2: 188.
Rana cantabridgensis cantabridgensis — Cope, 1886, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 23: 520. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Rana cantabridgensis latiremis Cope, 1886, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 23: 520. Syntypes: USNM (4 specimens), including USNM 13723, by original designation; USNM 13723–26 according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 73. Type locality: "Lake Alloknagits, Alaska", USA, given as "Lake Aleknagik, north of Nushagak, Alaska", USA by Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 73. Status of subspecies rejected by Boulenger, 1891, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, 8: 453-457.
Rana cantabrigensis evittata Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 435. Holotype: USNM 5169, by original designation. Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 72, mentioned 23 other "syntypes" but only one specimen was specified in the original and from only one locality. Type locality: "Puget Sound, Washington", USA. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1919, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 9, 3: 414.
Rana silvatica — Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 115. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Rana sylvatica sylvatica — Schmidt, 1938, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Ser., 20: 378.
Rana sylvatica cantabrigensis — Schmidt, 1938, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Ser., 20: 379. Status rejected by Martof and Humphries, 1959, Am. Midl. Nat., 61: 350–389.
Rana sylvatica latiremis — Schmidt, 1938, Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ., Zool. Ser., 20: 378. Status rejected by Martof and Humphries, 1959, Am. Midl. Nat., 61: 350–389.
Rana sylvatica cherokiana Witschi, 1954 "1953", Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 60: 764. Holotype: USNM 134417, by original designation. Type locality: "Murphy, [Cherokee County,] North Carolina [USA], elevation 462 m (1540 ft.) (Appalachian Mountains)". Status rejected by Martof and Humphries, 1959, Am. Midl. Nat., 61: 350–389.
Rana maslini Porter, 1969, Herpetologica, 25: 213. Holotype: USNM 166435, by original designation. Type locality: "sub-alpine park 0. 25 miles north of Fox Park, Albany County, Wyoming at 9,000 ft", USA. Synonymy by Bagdonas and Pettus, 1976, J. Herpetol., 10: 105–112. This synonymy rejected by Collins, 1991, Herpetol. Rev., 22: 43, and Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12, without discussion.
Rana (Rana) sylvatica — Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 41. Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 333.
Rana (Novirana) sylvatica — Hillis and Wilcox, 2005, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 34: 305. See Dubois, 2006, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 317–330, Hillis, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 331–338, and Dubois, 2007, Cladistics, 23: 390–402, for relevant discussion of nomenclature.
Lithobates sylvaticus — Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 369; Che, Pang, Zhao, Wu, Zhao, and Zhang, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 43: 1–13; by implication.
Lithobates (Aquarana) sylvaticus — Dubois, 2006, C. R. Biol., Paris, 329: 829; Dubois, 2006, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 325.
Rana (Lithobates) sylvatica — Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 428.
Rana sylvatica — Yuan, Zhou, Chen, Poyarkov, Chen, Jang-Liaw, Chou, Matzke, Iizuka, Min, Kuzmin, Zhang, Cannatella, Hillis, and Che, 2016, Syst. Biol., 65: 835.
Boreorana sylvatica — Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 248.
Common Names
Wood Frog (LeConte, 1825, Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, 1: 284; Smith, 1833, Rep. Geol. Mineral. Bot. Zool. Massachusetts: 552; Storer, 1840, Boston J. Nat. Hist., 3: 46; Verrill, 1863, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 9: 198; Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 25; Hay, 1892, Annu. Rep. Dept. Geol. Nat. Res. Indiana for 1891: 479; Fowler, 1907, Annu. Rep. N.J. State Mus. for 1906: 138; Brimley, 1907, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc., 23: 158; Wright and Wright, 1933, Handb. Frogs Toads U.S. Canada: xi; Stebbins, 1951, Amph. W. North Am.: 373; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 81; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 177; Stebbins, 1966, Field Guide W. North Am. Rept. Amph.: 71; Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 343; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 13; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 109; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 13; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 15; Frost, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2008, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 37: 9; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 9; Frost, McDiarmid, Mendelson, and Green, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 18; Frost, Lemmon, McDiarmid, and Mendelson, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 16).
Northern Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica cantabrigensis [no longer recognized]: Dickerson, 1906, The Frog Book: 211; Slevin, 1928, Occas. Pap. California Acad. Sci., 16: 132; Wright and Wright, 1933, Handb. Frogs Toads U.S. Canada: xi; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 81; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 177).
Cherokee Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica cherokiana [no longer recognized]: Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 177).
Eastern Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica sylvatica [no longer recognized]: Dickerson, 1906, The Frog Book: 205; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 79; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 177),
Maslin's Wood Frog (Rana maslini [no longer recognized]: Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 13; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 108; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 13).
Cambridge Frog (Rana sylvatica cantabrigensis [no longer recognized]: Yarrow, 1882, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 24: 25).
Distribution
Northern Alaska (USA) and Labrador (Canada) south to northern Idaho, Minnesota, northern Georgia, east-central Alabama, and Massachusetts (USA); isolated populations in southern Missouri and adjacent Arkansas, and northern Colorado (USA).
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Canada, United States of America, United States of America - Alabama, United States of America - Alaska, United States of America - Arkansas, United States of America - Colorado, United States of America - Connecticut, United States of America - Delaware, United States of America - District of Columbia, United States of America - Georgia, United States of America - Idaho, United States of America - Illinois, United States of America - Indiana, United States of America - Iowa, United States of America - Kentucky, United States of America - Maine, United States of America - Maryland, United States of America - Massachusetts, United States of America - Michigan, United States of America - Minnesota, United States of America - Missouri, United States of America - New Hampshire, United States of America - New Jersey, United States of America - New York, United States of America - North Carolina, United States of America - North Dakota, United States of America - Ohio, United States of America - Pennsylvania, United States of America - Rhode Island, United States of America - South Carolina, United States of America - South Dakota, United States of America - Tennessee, United States of America - Vermont, United States of America - Virginia, United States of America - West Virginia, United States of America - Wisconsin, United States of America - Wyoming
Comment
Tentatively considered a member of the Rana temporaria group by Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 41, and Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 333, included it in his section Rana, Rana (Rana) temporaria group. See Case, 1978, Syst. Zool., 27: 299–311; Post and Uzzell, 1981, Syst. Zool., 30: 170–180. Martof and Humphries, 1959, Am. Midl. Nat., 61: 350–389, recognized five general types of Rana sylvatica in North America. Reviewed by Martof, 1970, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 86: 1–4. See Zeyl, 1993, J. Herpetol., 27: 233–236, for summary of geographic allozyme variation. Rana maslini Porter, 1969, has been considered a distinct species by some authors although this was rejected by Bagdonas and Pettus, 1976, J. Herpetol., 10: 105–112, on the basis of its lack of diagnosability. Stebbins, 2003, Field Guide W. Rept. Amph., Ed. 3: 227, provided a brief account, figure, and map. XXX, considered Lithobates sylvaticus to be the sister taxon of remaining Lithobates, while Hillis and Wilcox, 2005, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 34: 305, considered it to be the sister taxon of Aquarana. Graham, Timpe, and Giovanetto, 2008, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 494–495, provided the southernmost locality in Georgia, USA. Lee-Yaw, Irwin, and Green, 2010, Mol. Ecol., 17: 867–884, reported on molecular biogeography and intraspecific systematics, which documented an eastern and western clade. Scherer, Muths, Noon, and Oyler-McCance, 2012, Conserv. Genetics, 13: 1521–1530, reported on landscape genetics of isolated populations in Colorado, USA. Redmer and Trauth, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 590–593, and Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 2 : 637–669, provided detailed account that summarized relevant literature. Elliot, Gerhardt, and Davidson, 2009, Frogs and Toads of N. Am.: 198–201, provided an account, photos, and advertisement call. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 237–238, provided an account of larval morphology and biology. Skibbe, Farrar, Watson, and Richter, 2021, Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 16: 1–10, discussed landscape genetics on the Cumberland Plateau of Kentucky, USA. Guyer and Bailey, 2023, Frogs and Toads of Alabama: 93–97, provided a detailed account for Alabama, USA.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.