- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2022
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2021
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2021
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.1 (2004 to 2021)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Rana pirica Matsui, 1991
Rana ezoensis Kawamura, Nishioka, Ueda, Borkin, and Wu, 1985, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 2: 1010. Nomen nudum. Synonymy by Sumida, Ueda, and Nishioka, 2003, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 20: 578.
Rana pirica Matsui, 1991, Japan. J. Herpetol., 14: 69. Holotype: OMNH Am 9527, by original designation. Type locality: "Nakano-sawa, Minami-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan (43°00′N, 141°19′E, 300 m a. s. l.)".
Rana (Rana) pirica — Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 333; Yuan, Zhou, Chen, Poyarkov, Chen, Jang-Liaw, Chou, Matzke, Iizuka, Min, Kuzmin, Zhang, Cannatella, Hillis, and Che, 2016, Syst. Biol., 65: 835.
Rana (Laurasiarana) pirica — Hillis and Wilcox, 2005, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 34: 311, by implication; see Dubois, 2006, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 317-330, and Hillis, 2007, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42: 331-338, for discussion.
English Names
Hokkaido Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 109).
Ezo Brown Frog (Matsui, 1991, Japan. J. Herpetol., 14: 260).
Distribution
Hokkaido I., Japan, and Sakhalin and Kurile Is., Russia.
Comment
In the Rana chensinensis group of the subgenus Rana, section Rana according to Dubois, 1992, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 61: 333. Formerly confused with Rana dybowskii and Rana chensinensis. Most closely related to Rana dybowskii and Rana ornativentris according to the original publication. Tanaka, Matsui, and Takenaka, 1994, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 11: 753-757, discussed the relationships of this species with Rana ornativentris, Rana japonica, Rana tagoi, and Rana sakuraii. See Tanaka-Ueno, Matsui, Sato, Takenaka, and Takenaka, 1998, Japan. J. Herpetol., 17: 91-97, for phylogenetic relationships and discussion. Tanaka-Ueno, Matsui, Sato, Takenaka, and Takenaka, 1998, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 15: 289-294, noted that the population of brown frogs on Sakhalin were Rana pirica, not Rana dybowskii. Trakimas, Matsui, Nishikawa, and Kasugai, 2003, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 41: 73-79, noted that allozyme variation is low among Hokkaido and Sakhalin populations. Sumida, Ueda, and Nishioka, 2003, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 20: 567-580, reported on molecular phylogenetic relationships and reproductive incompatability of this species with other brown frogs in East Asia. Matsui, Bassarukin, Kasugai, Tanabe, and Takenaka, 1994, Alytes, 12: 1-14, reported on the seemingly morphologically intermediate nature of frogs from Sakhalin between Rana pirica and Rana dybowskii. Goris and Maeda, 2004, Guide Amph. Rept. Japan: 84-86, provided an account for Japan, map, and photograph. See comment under Rana dybowskii. Matsui, 1991, Japan. J. Herpetol., 14: 260-284, provided an extensive account for population in Far East Russia. Che, Pang, Zhao, Matsui, and Zhang, 2007, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 24: 71-80, found Rana pirica to be imbedded within Rana dybowskii on the basis of mtDNA data. Kuzmin, 2013, Amph. Former Soviet Union, Ed. 2: 227–230, provided an account for the former USSR. Yang, Zhou, Min, Matsui, Dong, Li, and Fong, 2017, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 112: 148–157, reported on the molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of this species within the Rana dybowskii species complex.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist; for a quick link to their maps see iNaturalist KML
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.