- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.1 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Pseudophilautus adspersus (Günther, 1872)
Ixalus adspersus Günther, 1872, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 4, 9: 87. Holotype: BMNH 1947.2.26.89 (formerly 1871.12.14.36) according to Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 73. Type locality: "Peradeniya ... collected chiefly in the neighbourhood of the locality named . . . . Ceylon", Sri Lanka. Manamendra-Arachchi and Pethiyagoda, 2005, Raffles Bull. Zool., Suppl., 12: 205, noted the type locality as "Nuwara Eliya, a resort town among mountains rising to 1,700–2,500 m".
Rhacophorus (Philautus) adspersus — Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 94.
Philautus adspersus — Inger, 1985, in Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 526.
Philautus (Philautus) adspersus — Bossuyt and Dubois, 2001, Zeylanica, 6: 24.
Pseudophilautus adspersus — Li, Che, Murphy, Zhao, Zhao, Rao, and Zhang, 2009, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 53: 519. Provisional change by implication.
English Names
Sri Lanka Bubble-nest Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 111).
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in central Sri Lanka. See comment.
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Philautus variabilis by Inger, 1985, in Frost (ed.), Amph. Species World: 526, where it had been placed by Kirtisinghe, 1957, Amph. Ceylon: 74. This arrangement was followed tentatively by Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 73, Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 73, and Bossuyt and Dubois, 2001, Zeylanica, 6: 24. Manamendra-Arachchi and Pethiyagoda, 2005, Raffles Bull. Zool., Suppl., 12: 202–205, provided an account and noted this species as extinct. Dutta, 1997, Amph. India Sri Lanka: 174, and Biju, 2001, Occas. Publ. Indian Soc. Conserv. Biol., 1: 19, considered records for Karnataka, India, to be erroneous. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 139, who regarded the species as extinct. Regarded as extinct by Batuwita, Udugampala, De Silva, Diao, and Edirisinghe, 2019, J. Anim. Diversity, 1: 48, and Jayawardena, Senevirathne, Wijayathilaka, Ukuwela, Manamendra-Arachchi, and Meegaskumbura, 2017, Ceylon J. Sci., 46 (Special issue): 48.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.