Rhinoderma darwinii Duméril and Bibron, 1841

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Rhinodermatidae > Genus: Rhinoderma > Species: Rhinoderma darwinii

Rhinoderma darwinii Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 659. Holotype: MNHNP 4911, according to Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 34. Type locality: "Chili" (= Chile). Restricted to "Chile (Valdivia)" by Cei, 1962, Batr. Chile: 111.

Bombinator (Rhinoderma) DarwiniiSchlegel, 1858, Handl. Dierkd., 2: 59.

Rhinoderma darwinii var. lateralis Werner, 1898 "1897", Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Suppl., 4: 264. Types: Not stated, but presumably ZIUW or NHMW. Type locality: "Chile".

Rhinoderma darwinii var. unicolor Werner, 1898 "1897", Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Suppl., 4: 264. Types: Not stated, but presumably ZIUW or NHMW. Type locality: "Chile".

Rhinoderma darwinii var. picta Werner, 1898 "1897", Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Suppl., 4: 264. Types: Not stated, but presumably ZIUW or NHMW. Type locality: "Chile".

Rhinoderma darwinii var. angulata Werner, 1898 "1897", Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Suppl., 4: 265. Types: Not stated, but presumably ZIUW or NHMW. Type locality: "Chile".

Common Names

Darwin's Toad (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World: 106).

Darwin's Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 114).

Mouth-breeding Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 135).

Distribution

Western slopes of the Andes, Central Valley, and coastal range, from Concepción Province to Aysén Province, Chile; adjacent Argentina in Lanín and Nahuel Huapi National Parks, Argentina, in very humid and Valdivian temperate forests, 50–1100 m elevation.

Geographic Occurrence

Natural Resident: Argentina, Chile

Comment

See account by Cei, 1962, Batr. Chile: 111–115, and Cei, 1980, Monit. Zool. Ital., N.S., Monogr., 2: 213–215. Penna and Veloso, 1990, J. Herpetol., 24: 23–33, reported on advertisement call. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 541. Bourke, Busse, and Bakker, 2011, Herpetol. J., 21: 227–234, reported on sex differences in dorsal pattern and body coloration. See Lobos, Vidal-Maldonado, Correa-Quezada, Labra-Lillo, Díaz-Páez, Charrier, Rabanal, Díaz-Vidal, and Tala, 2013, Anf. Chile Conserv.: 1–104, for photograph, comments on conservation status, and range. Bourke, Busse, and Böhme, 2018, North-West. J. Zool., Romania, 14: 165–170, modeled the range and the expected effect of climate change. See Charrier, 2019, Anf. Bosques Centro Sur y Patagonia de Chile: 242–247, for account (morphology, habitat, natural history) and polygon distribution map. Serrano-Serrano, Penna, and Soto-Azat, 2020, Bioacoustics, 29: 522–589, reported on acoustics. Úbeda and Pastore, 2021, Bol. Chil. Herpetol., 8: 1–9, reported on the range, habitat, and conservation status in Argentina.  Bidart-Enriquez, Serrano-Serrano, Penna, and Velásquez, 2025, Rev. Latinoam. Herpetol., 8: 177–133, suggested, on the basis of study of advertisement calls and morphology, that Rhinoderma rufum cannot adequately be distinguished from Rhinoderma darwini. But, they suggested that the nominal species species might be maintained pending genetic studies. DRF takes the conservative position here inasmuch as the conservation issues are severe if synonymy is made without genetic studies. They also suggested that the population from Isla Chiloe, Chile, is acoustically distinctive but may just represent the extreme of geographic variation within Rhinoderma darwini.  

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.