- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Rhinoderma rufum (Philippi, 1902)
Heminectes rufus Philippi, 1902, Supl. Batr. Chil. Descr. Hist. Fis. Polit. Chile: 10. Holotype: MNHNC according to the original publication, lost, although illustrated by Cei, 1958, Invest. Zool. Chilen., 4: 279; IZUA A 1323 (from type locality) designated neotype by Formas, Pugin, and Jorquera, 1975, Physis, Buenos Aires, 34: 150; destroyed by fire on 3 December 2007. Type locality: "Vichuquen", Curicó Province, Chile; neotype from same locality.
Rhinoderma rufum — Formas, Pugin, and Jorquera, 1975, Physis, Buenos Aires, 34: 148.
Common Names
Chile Darwin's Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 114).
Distribution
Coastal Range, from Curico Province to Ramadillas in Arauco Province, Chile, 0–500 m elevation.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Chile
Endemic: Chile
Comment
Likely extinct; see Busse and Werning, 2002, Zool. Ges. Arten Populations. Mitt., 18: 16–18, who detailed the taxonomic history and disappearance of this species. Penna and Veloso, 1990, J. Herpetol., 24: 23–33, reported on advertisement call. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 541. Bourke, Busse, and Böhme, 2012, North-West. J. Zool., Romania, 8: 99–106, discussed the range and possible causes of decline. Formas, 2013, Zootaxa, 3641: 395–400, reported on the larval external morphology, oral morphology, and skeleton. See Charrier, 2019, Anf. Bosques Centro Sur y Patagonia de Chile: 248–249, for account (morphology, habitat, natural history) and polygon distribution map. Mella-Romero, Lamilla-Maulén, and Maya-Miranda, 2021, Bol. Chil. Herpetol., 8: 60–62, discussed the southern limit of the range and rejected records from Isla Mocha or Nahuelbuta National Park, Chile.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist