- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.1 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Ambystoma annulatum Cope, 1886
Amblystoma annulatum Cope, 1886, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 23: 525. Holotype: USNM 11564 according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 4. Type locality: "Unknown"; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 18, designated type locality as "vicinity of Hot Springs, [Garland County,] Arkansas", USA, but because this designation is not based on any evidence, it is invalid (cf.Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 75).
Linguaelapsus annulatus — Cope, 1887, Am. Nat., 21: 88; Cope, 1889, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 34: 115.
Ambystoma annulatum — Stejneger and Barbour, 1917, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept.: 8.
Ambystoma (Linguaelapsus) annulatum — Tihen, 1958, Bull. Florida State Mus., Biol. Sci., 3: 3, 43; Dubois and Raffaëlli, 2012, Alytes, 28: 77-161.
Linguaelapsus annulatum — Freytag, 1959, Vierteiljahrschrift Naturforsch. Ges. Zürich, 104: 88; Freytag, 1962, Aquar. Terrar. Z., 9: 173-176.
Ambystoma annulatum — Anderson, 1965, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 19: 1.
English Names
Ringed Salamander (Bishop, 1943, Handb. Salamanders: 115; Schmidt, 1953, Check List N. Am. Amph. Rept., Ed. 6: 17; Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 173; Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 252; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 4; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 27; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 5; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 18; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 13; Collins and Taggart, 2009, Standard Common Curr. Sci. Names N. Am. Amph. Turtles Rept. Crocodil., ed. 6: 10; Tilley, Highton, and Wake, 2012, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 39: 23; Powell, Conant, and Collins, 2016, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. North Am., 4th ed.: 30; Highton, Bonett, and Jockusch, 2017, in Crother (ed.), Herpetol. Circ., 43: 22).
Distribution
Ozark region of central Missouri, central and western Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma south to near the Texas border, USA.
Comment
See detailed accounts by Anderson, 1965, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 19: 1–2, Petranka, 1998, Salamand. U.S. Canada: 37–40, and Trauth, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 602–603. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 114, provided a brief account, photo, and map. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 80–81, provided an account of larval morphology. Burkhart, Puckett, Beringer, Sholy, Semlitsch, and Eggert, 2019 9: 11171–11184, reported on the post-Pleistocene population differentiation. Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 181–182, provided an account, summarizing systematics, life history, population status, and distribution (including a polygon map).
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.