- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Bolitoglossa rufescens (Cope, 1869)
Oedipus rufescens Cope, 1869, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 21: 104. Holotype: USNM 6886, by original designation; lost according to Dunn, 1926, Salamanders Fam. Plethodontidae: 418. Not mentioned in USNM type list by Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 1-291, so presumed lost. Lost prior to 1926 according to Tighe, 2022, Smithson. Contrib. Zool., 654: 42, briefly discussed the current location of paratypes. . Type locality: "Orizava" (= Orizaba), Veracruz, Mexico.
Spelerpes (Oedipus) rufescens — Peters, 1873, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1873: 617.
Geotriton rufescens — Smith, 1877, Tailed Amph.: 76.
Spelerpes rufescens — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Grad. Batr. Apoda Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 71.
Oedipus rufescens — Dunn, 1926, Salamanders Fam. Plethodontidae: 418.
Bolitoglossa rufescens — Taylor, 1941, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 27: 145.
Palmatotriton rufescens — Smith, 1945, Ward’s Nat. Sci. Bull., 19: 4.
Bolitoglossa rufescens — Smith and Taylor, 1948, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 194: 23.
Bolitoglossa (Nanotriton) rufescens — Parra-Olea, García-París, and Wake, 2004, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 81: 335.
Common Names
Northern Banana Salamander (Liner, 1994, Herpetol. Circ., 23: 11; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 30; Lee, 2000, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Maya World: 56; Liner and Casas-Andreu, 2008, Herpetol. Circ., 38: 29).
Rufescent Salamander (Lee, 1996, Amph. Rept. Yucatan Peninsula: 43).
Common Dwarf Salamander (Campbell, 1998, Amph. Rept. N. Guatemala Yucatan Belize: 39).
Orizaba Banana Salamander (Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 666).
Distribution
Extreme eastern San Luis Potosí (Mexico) south through Veracruz and adjacent Puebla, and, provisionally east of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in Chiapas and Guatemala to Belize and northwestern Honduras, along the Atlantic slopes (see comment).
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico
Comment
Formerly in the Bolitoglossa rufescens group which now constitutes the subgenus Nanotriton according to Parra-Olea, García-París, and Wake, 2004, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 81: 335. Populations near Catemaco, Veracruz, Mexico, were referred to this species (rather than Bolitoglossa occidentalis) by Larson, 1983, Herpetologica, 39: 97. See also Elias, 1984, Contrib. Sci. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 348: 11; Lee, 1996, Amph. Rept. Yucatan Peninsula: 43–44; Campbell, 1998, Amph. Rept. N. Guatemala Yucatan Belize: 39–40; and Lee, 2000, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Maya World: 56-57. McCranie and Wilson, 2002, Amph. Honduras: 129–131, suggested that nominal Bolitoglossa rufescens from Honduras is not conspecific with Bolitoglossa rufescens from farther north. McCranie, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 36, summarized the departmental distribution in Honduras. Campbell, Smith, Streicher, Acevedo, and Brodie, 2010, Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 200: 40, confirmed the distinctivenes of this species from Bolitoglossa occidentalis, named the Guatemalan population southeast of the Rio Motagua (as Bolitoglossa nympha), and noted that the populations east of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec were unlikely to be conspecific with Bolitoglossa rufescens (sensu stricto). The Sierra Juarez population in Oaxaca was recently named as Bolitoglossa chinanteca. Rovito, Parra-Olea, Vásquez-Almazán, Luna-Reyes, and Wake, 2012, BMC Evol. Biol., 12(255): 1–16, provided molecular evidence of even more unnamed lineages. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 40–69, compared this species with others from Central America and provided a map and photograph. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 313–314, provided a brief account, photograph, and map. Hess, Itgen, Firneno, Nifong, and Townsend, 2017, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 55: 150–155, on the basis of mtDNA, suggested that several identifiable, and largely allopatric populations currently identified as Bolitoglossa rufescens complex: 1) a population including the type locality (Orizaba) in Veracruz and presumably extending north into San Luis Potosi and into montane eastern Oaxaca and western Chiapas, Mexico; 2) a population from the Tuxtlas of Veracruz, Mexico; 3) a montane "Guatemala" clade of found from montane Huehuetenango and Alta Verapaz; 4) a population from the Sierra de Omoa in northwestern Honduras; and 5) a population from the vicinity of Catemaco, Veracruz, Mexico. See account by Cázares-Hernández, Molohua Tzitzihua, Méndez Quiahua, Quiahua Colotl, Temoxtle Marquez, Rodriguez Merino, and Apale Pacheco, 2018, Tlaconetes: 1–92, for photos, habitat, life history, and conservation status. Luría-Manzano, Ramírez-Valverde, and Juárez-Ortiz, 2021, Herpetol. Rev., 52: 341, reported a specimen from the municipality of San Sebastián Tlacotepec, Puebla, Mexico. Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 666–670, provided an account summarizing systematics, life history, population status, and distribution (including a polygon map).
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist