- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Oedipina stuarti Brame, 1968
Oedipina stuarti Brame, 1968, J. Herpetol., 2: 47. Holotype: ZMH 1341, by original designation; renumbered ZMH A00871 according to Solis, Espinal, Valle, O'Reilly, Itgen, and Townsend, 2016, Salamandra, 52: 128. Type locality: "Amapala, Isla Tigre, in the Golfo de Fonseca, Departamento de Valle, Honduras". Type locality discussed by Solis, Espinal, Valle, O'Reilly, Itgen, and Townsend, 2016, Salamandra, 52: 127–128, who came to the conclusion that "We conclude there is a strong likelihood that the two specimens of O. stuarti reported to have come from Isla el Tigre actually originated from mining areas to the east of Aramecina (13.741° N, 87.711° W, WGS 84), on the mainland of Honduras in the northern portion of the Department of Valle".
Oedipina (Oedipina) stuarti — García-París and Wake, 2000, Copeia, 2000: 60.
Common Names
Stuart's Worm Salamander (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 32).
Distribution
Known only from the type locality (northern portion of the Department of Valle, Honduras).
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Honduras
Endemic: Honduras
Comment
See account by McCranie and Wilson, 2002, Amph. Honduras: 158–159, who noted that this species has not been collected since prior to 1904. McCranie, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 36, summarized the departmental distribution in Honduras. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 82–90, compared this species with others from Central America and provided a map and photograph, noting that the Tegucigalpa record is questionable. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 385, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Solis, Espinal, Valle, O'Reilly, Itgen, and Townsend, 2016, Salamandra, 52: 125–133, discussed the provenance of the holotype, modifying the type locality, redelimited the species, excluding the Tegucigalpa population as Oedipina capitalina. Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 874–875, provided an account.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist