- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Chioglossa lusitanica Barboza du Bocage, 1864
Chioglossa lusitanica Barboza du Bocage, 1864, Rev. Mag. Zool., Paris, Ser. 2, 16: 249 (September 1864). Also described subsequently by Barboza du Bocage, 1864, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1864: 264-265 (November 1864) as discussed by Arntzen, 1999, in Grossenbacher and Thiesmeier (eds.), Handbuch Rept. Amph. Eur., 4(1): 305. Syntype(s): MLB (destroyed in 1978 fire) and ZMB 6481 (3 specimens, presumably on exchange from MLB), MNHNP 1182 and 1182A (according to Thireau, 1986, Cat. Types Urodeles Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Rev. Crit.: 37); MNHNP 1182A designated lectotype by Arntzen and Alexandrino in Arntzen, Groenenberg, Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Sequeira, 2007, J. Nat. Hist., London, 41: 933 . Type localities: "Coimbra" and "montagne de Bussaco, à cinq lieues de Coimbra", Portugal. Rendered as "Berg Bussaco bei Coimba, Portugal" by Mertens and Müller, 1928, Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 41: 15. Lectotype from Buçaco, Beira Litoral, Portugal, according to Arntzen and Alexandrino in Arntzen, Groenenberg, Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Sequeira, 2007, J. Nat. Hist., London, 41: 933.
Chioglossa lusitanica brevidigitata Ferrand de Almeida, Ferrand de Almeida, Gonçalves, Sequeira, Teixeira, and Ferrand de Almeida, 2001, Amph. Rept. Portugal: 57. Type(s): Not designated. Type locality: Not provided. Unavailable name as discussed by Crochet and Dubois, 2004, In Gasc et al. (eds)., Atlas Amph. Rept. Europe, Ed. 2: 496.
Chioglossa lusitanica lusitanica — Arntzen and Alexandrino In Arntzen, Groenenberg, Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Sequeira, 2007, J. Nat. Hist., London, 41: 934.
Chioglossa lusitanica longipes Arntzen and Alexandrino In Arntzen, Groenenberg, Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Sequeira, 2007, J. Nat. Hist., London, 41: 934. Holotype: RMNH 40113, by original designation. Type locality: "Valongo, Douro Litoral in northwestern Portugal".
Common Names
Golden-striped Salamander (Hellmich, 1962, Rept. Amph. Eur.: 52; Steward, 1969, Tailed Amph. Eur.: 39; Arnold and Burton, 1978, Field Guide Rept. Amph. Brit. Eur.: 35; Stumpel-Rienks, 1992, Ergänzungsband Handbuch Rept. Amph. Eur., Trivialnamen der Herpetofauna Eur.: 47; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 35; Oliveira, 1997, in Gasc et al. (eds.), Atlas Amph. Rept. Eur.: 52-53).
Gold-striped Salamander (Halliday and Adler, 2002, New Encyclop. Rept. Amph.: 57).
Southern Golden-striped Salamander (Chioglossa lusitanica lusitanica: Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 258).
Northern Golden-striped Salamander (Chioglossa lusitanica longipes: Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 259).
Distribution
Northwestern Spain (Galicia and Asturias) and the northern-central part of Portugal; introduced into the Sintra mountains about 20 km northwest of Lisbon.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Portugal, Spain
Introduced: Portugal
Comment
Busack, 1976, Biol. Conserv., 10: 309–319, suggested that this species' range is decreasing; Arntzen, 1984, Biol. Conserv., 28: 89–92, suggested that the population size was underestimated by Busack due to the line-transect method of estimation employed and the difficulty of finding salamanders even when they are present. Arntzen, 2015, Diversity, 7 found one population showed drastic population size decline over the last 40 years, and another drastically increasing in the same period. See discussion of the date of description by Thireau, 1986, Cat. Types Urodeles Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Rev. Crit.: 37, and Bauer, Good, and Günther, 1993, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 69: 295. Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Arntzen, 1997, Biochem. Genet., 35: 371-381, reported on genetic variation and noted significant differences among populations north and south of the Mondego River. Alexandrino, Arntzen, and Ferrand de Almeida, 2002, Heredity, 88: 66-74, reported on molecular phylogeography. See also discussion of relevant literature and distribution by Oliveira, 1997, in Gasc et al. (eds.), Atlas Amph. Rept. Eur.: 52-53. Arntzen, 1999, in Grossenbacher and Thiesmeier (eds.), Handbuch Rept. Amph. Eur., 4(1): 301–321, provided a review of the biology. Barbadillo-Escrivá, 1987, Guia INCAFO Anf. Rept. Peninsula Iberica: 91-95, provided an account. Obst in Engelmann, Fritzsche, Günther, and Obst, 1993, Lurche Kriechtiere Eur.: 67-68, provided a brief account, figure, and map. Vences, 1997, in Pleguezuelos (ed.), Dist. Biogeogr. Anf. Rep. Esp. Portugal: 103–105, provided a brief account, photograph, and detailed map. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 216, provided a brief account, photograph, and map. Sequeira, Alexandrino, Weiss, and Ferrand de Almeida, 2008, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 95: 371-387, reported on molecular phylogeographics. Arntzen, Groenenberg, Alexandrino, Ferrand de Almeida, and Sequeira, 2007, J. Nat. Hist., London, 41: 925–936, reported on geographic variation and named a new subspecies. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 600. Nöllert and Nöllert, 1992, Die Amph. Eur.: 155–159, provided a brief account and polygon map for Europe. Raffaëlli, 2013, Urodeles du Monde, 2nd ed.: 216, provided a brief account, photograph, and map. Sparreboom, 2014, Salamanders Old World: 176–179, reviewed the biology, characteristics, distribution, reproduction, and conservation of the species. Speybroeck, Beukema, Bok, and Van Der Voort, 2016, Field Guide Amph. Rept. Brit. Eur.: 75–76, provided a brief account and distribution map. Cabana and Galán, 2017, Bol. Asoc. Herpetol. Esp., 28: 3–7, discussed the elevational range in Galicia, Spain. Aguilar, Madeira, Crespo, and Rebelo, 2018, Herpetol. J., 28: 148–154, discussed the introduction and continued existence of the population near Lisbon, Portugal. See Dufresnes, 2019, Amph. Eur., N. Afr., & Middle East: 166, for brief summary of identifying morphology and biology, a range map, as well as a photograph (see p. 209 for photographs and map of subspecies). Raffaëlli, 2022, Salamanders & Newts of the World: 258–261, provided subspecies accounts, summarizing systematics, life history, population status, and distribution (including a polygon map).
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist