- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Herpelidae Laurent, 1984
Herpelinae Laurent, 1984, Acta Zool. Lilloana, 37: 199–200. Type genus: Herpele Peters, 1880.
Herpeloidi — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 163. Supertribe.
Herpelini — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 163. Tribe.
Herpeliti — Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 164. Subtribe.
Afrocaeciliiti Lescure, Renous, and Gasc, 1986, Mem. Soc. Zool. France, 43: 164. Type genus: Afrocaecilia Taylor, 1968. Coined as a subtribe. Synonymy by Wilkinson, San Mauro, Sherratt, and Gower, 2011, Zootaxa, 2874: 3.
Herpelidae — Wilkinson, San Mauro, Sherratt, and Gower, 2011, Zootaxa, 2874: 47.
Common Names
African Caecilians (Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed.: 451; Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 18).
Distribution
Southeastern Nigeria east to western Central African Republic and south to extreme western Dem. Rep. Congo, possibly into the adjacent Cabinda enclave of Angola; Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda, and Malawi, to be expected in Uganda, Dem. Rep. Congo, Zambia, and Burundi.
Comment
Wilkinson, San Mauro, Sherratt, and Gower, 2011, Zootaxa, 2874: 41–64, redefined and redelimited the taxon to include only Boulengerula and Herpele, thereby rendering it monophyletic. Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583 (see comment in Amphibia record) on the basis of molecular evidence confirmed the monophyly of the group and provided a tree that suggested that Herpelidae is the sister taxon of all caecilians with the exception of Scolecomorphidae, Ichthyophiidae, and Rhinatrematidae. Blackburn and Wake, 2011, In Zhang (ed.), Zootaxa, 3148: 39–55, briefly reviewed the taxonomic history of this taxon. San Mauro, Gower, Cotton, Zardoya, Wilkinson, and Massingham, 2012, Syst. Biol., 61: 661–674, confirmed this phylogenetic placement. Maddin, Russell, and Anderson, 2012, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 166: 160–201, reported on the braincase of the family and confirmed the phylogenetic placement of the family. Vitt and Caldwell, 2014, Herpetology, 4th Ed., provided a summary of range, diagnosis, life history, and taxonomy. Frétey, Dewynter, and Blanc, 2011, Clé de détermination, Amph. Afri. Centr. Angola: 1–232, provided a key for identification in Gabon and Equatorial Guinea. Dubois, Ohler, and Pyron, 2021, Megataxa, 5: 1–738, considered Herpelidae to be a subfamily of Caeciliidae, and included Chikilidae as a tribe of their Herpelinae.
Contained taxa (11 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist