- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Pedostibes Günther, 1876
Pedostibes Günther, 1876 "1875", Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1875: 576. Type species: Pedostibes tuberculosus Günther, 1876 "1875", by monotypy.
Common Names
Asian Tree Toads (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 45).
Tree Toads (Dinesh, Radhakrishnan, Deepak, and Kulkarni, 2023, Fauna India Checklist, vers. 5.0 : 3).
Distribution
Western Ghats of Maharashtra to southern Kerala and adjacent southwestern Tamil Nadu in isolated montane rainforest localities, 300 to 1800 m elevation.
Comment
Barbour, 1938, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 51: 191–195, supplied synonymies and distributions in the sense of including what is now Rentapia. Graybeal and Cannatella, 1995, Herpetologica, 51: 123, noted that there is no unambiguous morphological evidence in support of the monophyly of this taxon. Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de Sá, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler, 2006, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 297: 129, suggested on the basis of DNA sequence evidence that Pedostibes is most closely related to Phrynoidis. Smith and Chiszar, 2006, Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., 1: 6–8, implied that this taxon should be considered a subgenus of Bufo; see comment under Bufonidae. See comments under Sabahphrynus. Matsui, Yambun Imbun, and Sudin, 2007, Zool. Sci., Tokyo, 24: 1159–1166, corroborated a close relationship between Phrynoidis and Pedostibes. Van Bocxlaer, Biju, Loader, and Bossuyt, 2009, BMC Evol. Biol., 9 (e131): 1–10, noted that Pedostibes is polyphyletic, with their exemplar Pedostibes hosii being closely related to Duttaphrynus, but that Pedostibes tuberculosus is most closely related to a clade composed of Duttaphrynus and Adenomus. These authors suggested that the name Pedostibes will go with the group within which their exemplar Pedostibes tuberculosus falls (see below for resolution). Pyron and Wiens, 2011, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 61: 543–583, found Pedostibes tuberculosus (the name-bearer of Pedostibes) to be the sister taxon of a group composed of Schismaderma, Bufotes, Churamiti, Nectophrynoides, "Bufo" brongersmai, Xanthophryne, and Duttaphrynus. Another group of nominal Pedostibes (including their exemplars Pedostibes rugosus and Pedostibes hosii) was placed as the sister taxon of Phrynoidis. These authors made no taxonomic remedy for the phylogenetic problem. Ron, Mueses-Cisneros, Gutiérrez-Cárdenas, Rojas-Rivera, Lynch, Rocha, and Galarza, 2015, Zootaxa, 3947: 363, on the basis of 16s mtDNA analysis also concluded that Pedostibes is polyphyletic, suggesting that Pedostibes hosii and Pedostibes rugosus are more closely related to Phrynoidis and Pedostibes tuberculosus closer to Duttaphrynus + Xanthophryne, and suggested that the former two species could be transferred to Phrynoidis but declined to make the formal change. Subsequently, Chan, Grismer, Zachariah, Brown, and Abraham, 2016, PLoS One, 11(1: e0145903): 1–13, partitioned Pedostibes, restricting Pedostibes sensu stricto to India and referring the Sunda species to Rentapia.
Contained taxa (1 sp.):
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist