- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Chacophrys pierottii (Vellard, 1948)
Ceratophrys pierottii Vellard, 1948, Acta Zool. Lilloana, 5: 151. Holotype: FML 428/1; lost, according to Lavilla, 1994 "1992", Acta Zool. Lilloana, 42: 83. Hayward, 1963, Acta Zool. Lilloana, 19: 507, reports two "cotipos" (= paratypes) remaining. Type locality: "Hickman, Province de Salta, dans la région du Chaco", Argentina.
Stombus pierottii — Cei, 1955, Copeia, 1955: 291. Alternative combination.
Chacophrys pierotti — Reig and Limeses, 1963, Physis, Buenos Aires, 24: 125.
Ceratophrys pierotti — Lynch, 1971, Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 53: 106.
Common Names
Chaco Horned Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 71).
Lesser Chini Frog (Köhler, 1996, Herpetol. Rev., 28: 153).
Distribution
Salt flats in Chaco, Córdoba, Salta, Santiago del Estero, San Luis, and Rioja provinces in northern Argentina; western Paraguay; Tarija, Bolivia.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay
Comment
Considered a hybrid between Ceratophrys cranwelli and Lepidobatrachus llanensis by Lynch, 1982, Syst. Zool., 31: 166–179, but this view was rejected by Maxson and Ruibal, 1988, J. Herpetol., 22: 228–231, on the basis of immunological evidence. See Köhler, 1996, Herpetol. Rev., 28: 155–156, for Bolivian record. Rosset, 2001 "2000", Cuad. Herpetol., 14: 165, provided the southern Argentinian record. Brusquetti and Lavilla, 2006, Cuad. Herpetol., 20: 15, briefly discussed the range in Paraguay. Quinzio, Fabrezi, and Faivovich, 2006, S. Am. J. Herpetol., 1: 202–209, described the tadpole. Lescano, 2011, J. Nat. Hist., London, 45: 2929–2938, described the advertisement and distress calls. Weiler, Núñez, Airaldi, Lavilla, Peris, and Baldo, 2013, Anf. Paraguay: 49, provided a brief account, image, and dot map for Paraguay.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.