- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Dendrobates tinctorius (Cuvier, 1797)
Rana tinctoria Cuvier, 1797 "An. VI", Tabl. Element. Hist. Nat. Animaux: 295. Type(s): Not designated, although likely orginally in MNHNP. Type locality: "Amérique". Placed on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology by Anonymous, 2009, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 66: 103-105.
Calamita tinctorius Schneider, 1799, Hist. Amph. Nat.: 175. Type(s): Not designated or known to exist; LACM 43927 designated neotype by Silverstone, 1975, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 21: 47. Type locality: "Americae meridionalis"; neotype from "lower Rivière Matarony (Approuague drainage), Bruynzeel lumber camp, French Guiana, 35 m." (see comment).
Hyla tinctoria — Daudin, 1800, Hist. Nat. Quad. Ovip., Livr. 1: 7. Latreille IN Sonnini de Manoncourt and Latreille, 1801 "An. X", Hist. Nat. Rept., 2: 170; Daudin, 1802 "An. XI", Hist. Nat. Rain. Gren. Crap., Quarto: 25.
Rana tinctoria — Shaw, 1802, Gen. Zool., 3(1): 135.
Calamita tinctorius — Merrem, 1820, Tent. Syst. Amph.: 169.
Hylaplesia tinctoria —Boie in Schlegel, 1826, Bull. Sci. Nat. Geol., Paris, Ser. 2, 9: 239.
Dendrobates tinctorius — Wagler, 1830, Nat. Syst. Amph.: 202. Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 143.
Dendrobates tinctorius var. daudini Steindachner, 1864, Verh. Zool. Bot. Ges. Wien, 14: 262. Types: Based on animal figured by Daudin, 1802 "An. XI", Hist. Nat. Rain. Gren. Crap., Quarto: pl. 8, fig. 1, by original designation. Type locality: Not designated. Synonymy by Silverstone, 1975, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 21: 11.
Dendrobates machadoi Bokermann, 1958, Neotropica, 4: 73. Holotype: WCAB 3083, by original designation; now in MZUSP. Type locality: "Serra do Navio, Territorio Federal de Amapa, Brasil". Synonymy by Silverstone, 1975, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 21: 11.
Dendrobates azureus Hoogmoed, 1969, Zool. Meded., Leiden, 44: 134. Holotype: RMNH 13837A, by original designation. Type locality: "Sipaliwini, forest island on western slope Vier Gebroeders Mountain, 2° N 55° 58′ W, Surinam". Synonymy by Wollenberg, Veith, Noonan, and Lötters, 2006, Copeia, 2006: 623-629. See comment.
Dendrobates tinctorum — Silverstone, 1975, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 21: 11. Typographic error.
Dendrobates tinctorius azureus — Ouboter and Jairam, 2012, Amph. Suriname: 106.
Common Names
Tinging Frog (Shaw, 1802, Gen. Zool., 3(1): 135; Wood, 1863, Illust. Nat. Hist., 3: 175).
Dyeing Poison-arrow Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 50).
Dyeing Poison Frog (Walls, 1994, Jewels of the Rainforest: 24; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 50).
Blue Poison Frog (Dendrobates azureus [no longer recognized]: Walls, 1994, Jewels of the Rainforest: 20; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 49).
Blue Poison-arrow Frog (Dendrobates azureus [no longer recognized]:Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 48).
Giant Poison Frog (Dendrobates azureus [no longer recognized]:CITES).
Distribution
Lowland forests of Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana and adjacent Brazil.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Brazil, French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname
Comment
The nomenclatural history of this species was reviewed by Lescure, 1976, Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris, Ser. 3, Zool., 377: 484-486. Hoogmoed, 1971, Aquar. Terrar. Z., 24: 1-7, discussed distribution in Suriname. Problems associated with the neotype designation were discussed by Lescure, 1982, Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 39: 267. See account by Silverstone, 1975, Sci. Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Co., 21: 45-49. Lescure and Marty, 2000, Collect. Patrimoines Nat., Paris, 45: 88-91, provided a brief account and photo. Wollenberg, Veith, Noonan, and Lötters, 2006, Copeia, 2006: 623-629, discussed polymorphism and geographic genic variation. Noonan and Gaucher, 2006, Mol. Ecol., 15: 4425-4435, reported on geographic genic variation and the marks on this of vicariant biogeography. Lötters, Jungfer, Henkel, and Schmidt, 2007, Poison Frogs: 546-558, provided an account. Wollenberg, Lötters, Mora-Ferrer, and Veith, 2008, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 93: 433-444, reported on color pattern variation and evolution. See photograph, map, description of geographic range and habitat, and conservation status (as nominal Dendrobates azureus) in Stuart, Hoffmann, Chanson, Cox, Berridge, Ramani, and Young, 2008, Threatened Amph. World: 228. Avila-Pires, Hoogmoed, and Rocha, 2010, Bol. Mus. Parense Emilio Goeldi, Cienc. Nat., 5: 48, disputed the synonymy of Dendrobates azureus by way of the argument that the Wollenberg et al., 2008, molecular and morphometric data, favoring synonymy, might be wrong, but without offering counter-evidence beyond opinion. See account for Suriname population by Ouboter and Jairam, 2012, Amph. Suriname: 102-107.See Cole, Townsend, Reynolds, MacCulloch, and Lathrop, 2013, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 125: 392-393, for brief account and records for Guyana. Hoogmoed, 2019, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 13 (2: e190): 95–101, discussed nominal Dendrobates azureus and suggested reasons for doubting its synonymy. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Ferrão, Dias, Kaefer, Ferreira, Tavares-Pinheiro, Pinheiro-Freitas, and Costa-Campos, 2024, Zootaxa, 5399: 446–450, reported on tadpole morphology from Matão do Piaçacá, State of Amapá, Brazil. Sabino-Pinto, Mira, Lorioux-Chevalier, and Chouteau, 2024, Herpetol. Notes, 17: 243–250, discussed the change in dorsal pattern throughout the life of individuals.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist