- Amphibian Species of the World on Twitter
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.1 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Limnonectes conspicillatus (Günther, 1872)
Rana conspicillata Günther, 1872, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1872: 597. Syntypes: BMNH ("many spec." according to Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 20); including BMNH 1947.2.29.20–26 (formerly 1872.2.19.22–26) according to museum records; a total of 8 in the BMNH according Matsui, Dubois, and Ohler, 2013, Asian Herpetol. Res., Ser. 2, 4: 187, who designated BMNH 1947.2.29.20 as lectotype and noted that the remaining paralectotypes are of various other species, including Limnonectes khasianus and Limnonectes laticpes, and, according to Dehling and Dehling, 2017, Zootaxa, 4317: 293, Limnonectes hikidai. Type locality: "Matang", Sarawak (Borneo), Malaysia.
Limnonectes conspicillatus — Matsui, Dubois, and Ohler, 2013, Asian Herpetol. Res., Ser. 2, 4: 188; Dehling and Dehling, 2017, Zootaxa, 4317 : 295.
English Names
Broad-headed Creek Frog (Haas, Das, Hertwig, Bublies, and Schulz-Schaeffer, 2022, Guide to the Tadpoles of Borneo: 129).
Distribution
Known with any certainty only from the type locality (Matang), western Sarawak, Malaysia (Borneo) (see comment).
Geographics occurrence
Natural resident: Malaysia, Malaysia, East (Sarawak and/or Sabah)
Comment
Removed from the synonymy of Limnonectes kuhlii by Dehling and Dehling, 2017, Zootaxa, 4317: 294 (who redescribed the holotype), where it had been placed by Günther, 1874, Zool. Rec., 9: 79; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 20. Unfortunately, while the species was convincingly resurrected from synonymy, its natural range was not discussed. Haas, Das, Hertwig, Bublies, and Schulz-Schaeffer, 2022, Guide to the Tadpoles of Borneo: 129–132, summarized the knowledge of habitat, reproduction, larval morphology and coloration.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of information from other sites search Google
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.