- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Osteopilus septentrionalis (Duméril and Bibron, 1841)
Hyla lesueurii Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1828, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat., 14, 14: 452. Holotype: "V. planch. de ce Diction." (plate not seen by DRF), presumably the same as the frog illustrated by Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1831, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat., 17: plate cxxiv. Type locality: "la Havane", Cuba. Synonymy and consideration as a nomen oblitum under Art. 23.9.1 of the Interational Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1999) by Shea, 2001, J. Herpetol., 35: 339.
Hyla sueurii — Bory de Saint-Vincent, 1831, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat., 17: 133, plate cxxiv. Incorrect subsequent spelling.
Dendrohyas septentrionalis Tschudi, 1838, Classif. Batr.: 33, 74. Nomen nudum. See Stejneger, 1905, in Shattuck (ed.), Bahama Islands: 330.
Trachycephalus marmoratus Bibron in De la Sagra, 1840, Hist. Fis. Polit. Nat. Cuba, 8 (Atlas Zool.): plate 29 (Reptiles). Syntypes: 2 (possibly 3) specimens figured on plate. Presumably including MNHNP 4612.
Trachycephalus marmoratus Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 538. Holotype: MNHNP 4612 according to Guibé, 1950 "1948", Cat. Types Amph. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat.: 22. Type locality: "Cuba".
Hyla septentrionalis Duméril and Bibron, 1841, Erp. Gen., 6: 538. Name proposed in synonymy of Trachycephalus marmoratus. Suggested to be a replacement name for Trachycephalus marmoratus Duméril and Bibron, 1841, by Fouquette and Dubois, 2014, Checklist N.A. Amph. Rept.: 369.
Trachycephalus insulsus Cope, 1863, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 15: 43. Syntypes: USNM 12166 (formerly 6265) and 167237 (formerly 6266), according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 152. Including ANSP 2181, according to Malnate, 1971, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 123: 351. Type locality: "Cuba". Suggested synonym (with Trachycephalus marmoratus) by Gundlach, 1868, in Poey (ed.), Repert. Fis. Nat. Cuba, 2: 118. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 368 Barbour, 1914, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 44: 238.
Trachycephalus wrightii Cope, 1863, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 15: 45. Holotype: USNM 5174 according to Cochran, 1961, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 220: 81. Type locality: "District of Guantanamo, Southeastern Cuba". Suggested synonymy (with Trachycephalus marmoratus) by Gundlach, 1868, in Poey (ed.), Repert. Fis. Nat. Cuba, 2: 118. Synonymy by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 368; Barbour, 1914, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 44: 238; Barbour, 1916, Mem. Soc. Cubana Hist. Nat. Felipe Poey, 2: 126.
Trachycephalus septentrionalis — Barbour, 1904, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 46: 56.
Hyla schebestana Werner, 1917, Mitt. Naturhist. Mus. Hamburg, 34: 36. Holotype: ZMH, lost, according to Duellman, 1977, Das Tierreich, 95: 152, and Hallermann, 1998, Mitt. Hamburg. Zool. Mus. Inst., 95: 212. Type locality: "Kuba" (= Cuba). Synonymy by Duellman and Crombie, 1970, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 92: 1.
Hyla microterodisca Werner, 1921, Zool. Anz., 52: 178. Holotype: Collection not designated, presumably NHMW. Type locality: "Kuba". Synonymy by Schwartz, Thomas, and Ober, 1978, Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist., 5: 9.
Hyla septentrionalis septentrionalis — Barbour, 1937, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 82: 94.
Hyla dominicensis septentrionalis — Mertens, 1938, Senckenb. Biol., 20: 333; Peters, 1974, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 50: 301.
Hyla insulsa — Mittleman, 1950, Herpetologica, 6: 26.
Hyla dominicensis insulsa — Mittleman, 1950, Herpetologica, 6: 26.
Osteopilus septentrionalis — Trueb and Tyler, 1974, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 24: 39.
Common Names
Marbled Tree-toad (Trachycephalus marmoratus [no longer recognized]: Wood, 1863, Illust. Nat. Hist., 3: 172).
Giant Tree-frog (Carr, 1940, Univ. Florida Biol. Sci. Ser., 3: 62).
Cuban Treefrog (Conant, Cagle, Goin, Lowe, Neill, Netting, Schmidt, Shaw, Stebbins, and Bogert, 1956, Copeia, 1956: 176; Conant, 1975, Field Guide Rept. Amph. E. Cent. N. Am., Ed. 2: 325; Collins, Huheey, Knight, and Smith, 1978, Herpetol. Circ., 7: 12; Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 61; Collins, 1997, Herpetol. Circ., 25: 12; Crother, Boundy, Campbell, de Queiroz, Frost, Highton, Iverson, Meylan, Reeder, Seidel, Sites, Taggart, Tilley, and Wake, 2001 "2000", Herpetol. Circ., 29: 11; Hedges, Powell, Henderson, Hanson, and Murphy, 2019, Caribb. Herpetol., 67: 13).
Distribution
West Indies: native on Cuba, Isla de Pinos (now Isla de Juventud), Cayman Is., Bahama Is.; introduced on northwestern Puerto Rico, Curacao, St. Maarten and Saba (Netherlands Antilles), North Caicos (Turks and Caicos Islands), Nevis, Antigua, Oahu (Hawaii), U.S. Virgin Is., British Virgin Is. (St. Martin and Tortola), Anguilla, southeastern Louisiana, much of Florida and adjacent coastal Georgia and Mississippi (USA), and Puerto Limón, Costa Rica.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bahamas, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Virgin Islands, British
Introduced: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Costa Rica, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saint-Martin/Sint Maarten, Turks and Caicos Islands, United States of America, United States of America - Florida, United States of America - Georgia, United States of America - Hawaii, United States of America - Louisiana, United States of America - Mississippi, Virgin Islands, U.S.
Comment
Reviewed by Duellman and Crombie, 1970, Cat. Am. Amph. Rept., 92: 1–4 (as Hyla septentrionalis). See Powell, Passaro, and Henderson, 1992, Caribb. J. Sci., 28: 234–235, for St. Maarten, Netherlands Antilles. See discussion of species nomenclature by Mittleman, 1950, Herpetologica, 6: 24–26, in which he suggested that Hyla septentrionalis Schlegel, 1837, is not a nomen nudum and applies to Hyla chalconota. Anguilla record by Townsend, Eaton, Powell, Parmerlee, and Henderson, 2000, Caribb. J. Sci., 36: 326–328. See account by Savage, 2002, Amph. Rept. Costa Rica: 338–340. Introduced Florida population discussed by Butterfield, Meshaka, and Guyer, 1997, in Simberloff et al. (eds.), Strangers in Paradise: 123-138. Lever, 2003, Naturalized Rept. Amph. World: 180183, reported on introduced population in Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico Virgin Islands, St. Martin, Anguilla, and Nevis. Owen, Perry, Lazell, Petrovic, and Egelhoff, 2005, Herpetol. Rev., 36: 76, provided a record for Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Powell, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 215, provided a record for Saba I., Netherlands Antilles. Johnson, 2007, Herpetol. Rev., 38: 349, provided the record for Georgia, USA. Lindsay and Cooper, 2008, Appl. Herpetol., 5: 96–98, reported an introduced population on Antigua, West Indies. An introduced population in Curacao was reported by van Burt, 2007, Appl. Herpetol., 4: 390–391. Díaz and Cádiz, 2008, Guía Taxon. Anf. Cuba: 127–128, provided a brief account, illustration, and map. Meshaka, Boundy, and Williams, 2009, J. Kansas Herpetol., 32: 13–16, suggested that the expanding introduced population in Florida, USA, can be expected to extend west and south completely around the Gulf of Mexico. Wilson and Bechler, 2010, Herpetol. Rev., 41: 376, provided a northern Florida, USA, record of Nassau Country. Stevenson and Somma, 2011, Herpetol. Rev., 42: 107–108, provided a record for northern Florida and discussed the particulars of that introduced range. Reynolds, Niemiller, Riggs, and Manco, 2011, Herpetol. Rev., 42: 237–238, provided a record from the Turks and Caicos Islands. Henderson and Powell, 2009, Nat. Hist. Rept. Amph. W. Indies: 86–89, summarized the natural history literature. Meshaka, 2005, in Lannoo (ed.), Amph. Declines: 463–465, and Dodd, 2013, Frogs U.S. and Canada, 2: 822–827, provided an account that summarized the relevant literature particularly with reference to the introduced USA populations. Köhler, 2011, Amph. Cent. Am.: 245, provided a brief summary of natural history for the this species and provided a range map for Costa Rica and photograph for this species. Rivalta González, Rodríguez Schettino, Mancina, and Iturriaga, 2014, Smithson. Herpetol. Inform. Serv., 145: 34–36, provided a dot map and localities for Cuba. Hedges, 2011, Caribb. Herpetol., 20: 1, reported the introduced species in northwestern Puerto Rico. Altig and McDiarmid, 2015, Handb. Larval Amph. US and Canada: 202, provided an account of larval morphology and biology. Rodriguez, Börner, Pabijan, Gehara, Haddad, and Vences, 2015, Evol. Ecol., 29: 765–785 (and supplemental data), reported on phylogeographic diversity and its causes. Jarboe, Colbert, Moore, Steen, and Johnson, 2019, Herpetol. Rev., 50: 97–98, provided new records and discussed the range in Georgia, USA. De Massary, Bochaton, Bour, Dewynter, Ineich, Vidal, and Lescure, 2018, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 166: 59-78, reported the species from Saint-Barthélemy in the Lesser Antilles. De Massary, Bour, Dewynter, Ineich, Vidal, and Lescure, 2017, Bull. Soc. Herpetol. France, 164: 37–54, reported the species from Saint Martin, Lesser Antilles. Lieto and Burke, 2019, Herpetol. Rev., 50: 474–479, discussed the spread of invasive populations in the USA. Lindsay, Orchard, and Yokoyama, 2019, IRCF Rept. & Amph., 26: 125–126, reported tadpoles from an introduced population in Nevis I., Lesser Antilles. González-Sánchez, Johnson, González-Solís, Fucsko, and Wilson, 2021, ZooKeys, 1022: 92, discussed the introduced population in Costa Rica. Introduced populations in Florida, Mississippi, and Georgia, USA, discussed and mapped to county by Meshaka, Collins, Bury, and McCallum, 2022, Exotic Amph. Rept. USA: 45–47.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.