- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Scarthyla goinorum (Bokermann, 1962)
Hyla goinorum Bokermann, 1962, Neotropica, 8: 86. Holotype: WCAB 1401, by original designation; now in MZUSP. Type locality: "Tarauacá, Estado de Acre, Brasil".
Ololygon goinorum — Fouquette and Delahoussaye, 1977, J. Herpetol., 11: 393.
Scarthyla ostinodactyla Duellman and de Sá, 1988, Tropical Zool., 1: 119. Holotype: KU 205756, by original designation. Type locality: "Reserva Cuzco Amazónico, 15 km E Puerto Maldonado (12° 33′ S, 69° 03′ W, 200 m), Departamento Madre de Dios, Peru". Synonymy by De la Riva, 2000, Amphibia-Reptilia, 21: 495.
Scinax goinorum — Duellman and Wiens, 1992, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 151: 22.
Scarthyla goinorum — De la Riva, 2000, Amphibia-Reptilia, 21: 495.
Common Names
Tarauaca Snouted Treefrog (Scinax goinorum: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 64).
Madre de Dios Treefrog (Scarthyla ostinodactyla [no longer recognized]: Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 63).
Distribution
Upper Amazon Basin, from extreme northern Bolivia to the Iquitos region of northeastern Peru, as well as in adjacent Colombia, Acre (Brazil) and down the valley of the Amazon to Amapá and Pará, Brazil, and to extreme northeastern French Guiana.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, French Guiana, Peru
Comment
Scinax goinorum was included in the Scinax staufferi group by Duellman and Wiens, 1992, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 151: 22; transferred to Scarthyla as a senior synonym of Scarthyla ostinodactyla by De la Riva, 2000, Amphibia-Reptilia, 21: 495 Rodríguez and Duellman, 1994, Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ., 22: 47–48, provided a brief account for the Iquitos region of northeastern Peru as Scarthyla ostinodactyla. Duellman, 2005, Cusco Amazonico: 235–237, provided an account (adult and larval morphology, description of the call, life history). Lynch, 2005, Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 29: 581-588, provided a specific locality for the vicinity of Leticia, Colombia. Gascon, 1994, Herpetol. Rev., 25: 162, provided a number of localities from Amazonas, Brazil. França and Venâncio, 2010, Biotemas, 23: 71–84, provided a record for the municipality of Boca do Acre, Amazonas, with a brief discussion of the range. Bernarde, Machado, and Turci, 2011, Biota Neotrop., 11: 117–144, reported specimens from Reserva Extrativista Riozinho da Liberdade, Acre, Brazil. Lynch and Suárez-Mayorga, 2011, Caldasia, 33: 235–270, illustrated the tadpole and included the species in a key to the tadpoles of Amazonian Colombia. Telles, Carvalho, Gordo, Kaefer, Fonte, and Menin, 2017, Herpetozoa, Wien, 30: 88–92, provided new records for Amazonas and Pará, Brazil, and provided a dot map for the species. See brief account for the Manu region, Peru, by Villacampa-Ortega, Serrano-Rojas, and Whitworth, 2017, Amph. Manu Learning Cent.: 192–193. Metcalf, Marsh, Torres Pacaya, Graham, and Gunnels, 2020, Herpetol. Notes, 13: 753–767, reported the species from the Santa Cruz Forest Reserve, Loreto, northeastern Peru. Taucce, Costa-Campos, Carvalho, and Michalski, 2022, Eur. J. Taxon., 836: 96–130, reported on distribution, literature, and conservation status for Amapá, Brazil. Schiesari, Rossa-Feres, Menin, and Hödl, 2022, Zootaxa, 5223: 67–68, detailed larval morphology and natural history. Crnobrna, Santa-Cruz Farfan, Gallegos, López-Rojas, Llanqui, Panduro Pisco, and Kelsen Arbaiza, 2023, Check List, 19: 445, provided a record from Ucayali Department, central-eastern Peru. Premel, Villette, Ferrieux, and Piolain, 2024, Check List, 20: 1004–1007, provided a record from municipality of Ouanary, in the extreme northeastern part of French Guiana, and provided a dot map of the species.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.