- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Sphaenorhynchus caramaschii Toledo, Garcia, Lingnau, and Haddad, 2007
Sphaenorhynchus caramaschii Toledo, Garcia, Lingnau, and Haddad, 2007, Zootaxa, 1658: 60. Holotype: CFBH 2222, by original designation. Type locality: "a permanent pond at the Fazenda São Luís (24°21′30″ S, 48°44′35″ W; 910 m. altitude), municipality of Ribeirão Branco, state of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil".
Common Names
Lime Treefrog (Forti, Lingnau, and Bertoluci, 2017, Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 67: 197).
Distribution
Central and south-central São Paulo, eastern Paraná, and an isolated record in southern Santa Catarina in the southeast and south of Brazil.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Brazil
Endemic: Brazil
Comment
Most similar to Sphaenorhynchus surdus according to the original publication, where external morphology and the advertisement call were described. Almeida, Maffei, Rolim, Ubaid, and Jim, 2008, Check List, 4: 439-441, provided a new record for São Paulo, Brazil, and discussed the range. Araujo-Vieira, Tacioli, and Faivovich, 2015, Zootaxa, 3904: 270–282, reported on larval morphology. Forti, Lingnau, and Bertoluci, 2017, Vert. Zool., Senckenberg, 67: 197–205, reported on variation in the advertisement call. Melo, Rodrigues, Pelegrini, and Martins, 2018, Check List, 14: 779–783, provided new records from south-central São Paulo extending the range to the east. Pereira Silva, Ceron, Silva, and Santana, 2022, Ecol. Evol., 12(e8754): 1–15, reported on phylogenetic relationships and biogeography and provided a polygon map of the species.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist