- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and corrections, 2024
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2023
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Afrixalus osorioi (Ferreira, 1906)
Rappia osorioi Ferreira, 1906, J. Sci. Math. Phys. Nat., Lisboa, Ser. 2, 7: 162. Syntypes: MUP (3 specimens), by original indication. MUP 017307 (3 specimens) according to Ceríaco, Blackburn, Marques, and Calado, 2014, Alytes, 31: 22, who discussed the types. Type locality: "Quilombo", Angola.
Hyperolius osorioi — Noble, 1924, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 49: 251, 327; Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 309.
Megalixalus fornasinii congicus Laurent, 1941, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 35: 120. Holotype: MRAC 1167, by original designation. Type locality: "Buta (Uele)", Dem. Rep. Congo. Synonymy by Schiøtz, 1974, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., 137: 10.
Megalixalus (Afrixalus) fornasini congicus — Laurent, 1944, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 38: 113–114.
Afrixalus fornasini congicus — Guibé, 1948, Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris, Ser. 2, 20: 500, by implication.
Afrixalus dorsalis congicus — Laurent, 1950, Explor. Parc Natl. Albert, Miss. G.F. de Witte (1933–1935), 64: 14.
Afrixalus congicus congicus — Perret, 1960, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 61: 367.
Afrixalus osorioi — Laurent, 1972, Explor. Parc Natl. Virunga, Ser. 2, 22: 4.
Afrixalus osorioi congicus — Laurent, 1972, Explor. Parc Natl. Virunga, Ser. 2, 22: 4, 58.
Common Names
Angola Banana Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 66).
Osorio's Spiny Reed Frog (Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 140).
Congo Spiny Reed Frog (Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 140).
Forest Tree Frog (Lötters, Wagner, Bwong, Schick, Malonza, Muchai, Wasonga, and Veith, 2007, Fieldguide Amph. Rept. Kakamega Forest: 27).
Distribution
Gabon south to northwestern Angola and east through Rep. Congo and Dem. Rep. Congo and Uganda to extreme western Kenya.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Angola, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Congo, Republic of the, Gabon, Kenya, Uganda
Comment
See Schiøtz, 1974, Vidensk. Medd. Dansk Naturhist. Foren., 137: 10, and Perret, 1976, Bull. Soc. Neuchatel. Sci. Nat., 99: 27. See accounts by Laurent, 1972, Explor. Parc Natl. Virunga, Ser. 2, 22: 58-59; Laurent, 1982, Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Cent., Tervuren, Ser. Octavo, Sci. Zool., 235: 24; Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 49–50, and Channing, 2001, Amph. Cent. S. Afr.: 140-141. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 140-141, provided an account. Köhler, Scheelke, Schick, Veith, and Lötters, 2005, Afr. Zool., 40: 127-142, described the advertisement call. Lötters, Rotich, Koester, Kosuch, Muchai, Scheelke, Schick, Teege, Wasonga, and Veith, 2006, Salamandra, 42: 165-179, provided a Kenya locality. Lötters, Wagner, Bwong, Schick, Malonza, Muchai, Wasonga, and Veith, 2007, Fieldguide Amph. Rept. Kakamega Forest: 27-28, provided an account for the Kenya population. Jongsma, Tobi, Dixon-MacCallum, Bamba-Kaya, Yoga, Mbega, Mve Beh, Emrich, and Blackburn, 2017, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 11 (1: e144): 1, provided a record from Haut-Ogooué province in southeastern Gabon. Marques, Ceríaco, Blackburn, and Bauer, 2018, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 65 (Suppl. II): 86–87, provided a map for Angola and a brief account. Baptista, Conradie, Vaz Pinto, and Branch, 2019, In Huntley, Russo, Lages, and Ferrand (eds.), Biodiversity in Angola: 262, found the range to be questionable, with the type locality in Angola separated by 1000 km from the nearest other record in Dem. Rep. Congo. Dewynter, Frétey, Jongsma, Bamba-Kaya, and Pauwels, 2018, Cah. Fondation Biotope, 18: 18, provided a brief account and photographs from the Monts Birougou area of Gabon. Dewynter and Frétey, 2019, Cah. Fondation Biotope, 27: 22, summarized the literature for Gabon, excluded the East African component from the range without explanation, implying that the taxonomic status of the various populations deserves scrutiny, and provided photographs (p. 55). Spawls, Wasonga, and Drewes, 2019, Amph. Kenya: 17, provided a range map for Kenya, photograph, and brief characterization. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 156–157, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Mali, Banda, Chifundera, Badjedjea, Sebe, Lokasola, Ewango, Tungaluna, and Akaibe, 2019, Am. J. Zool., 2: 38–43, reported the species from the Okapi Wildlife Reserve, northeastern Dem. Rep. Congo. See brief account, range map, and photographs for Equatorial Guinea in Sánchez-Vialas, Calvo-Revuelta, Castroviejo-Fisher, and De la Riva, 2020, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 66: 137–230. Ernst, Lautenschläger, Branquima, and Hölting, 2020, Zoosyst. Evol., 96: 253, noted the presence in Uigé Province, northwestern Angola. Kako-Wanzalire, Mongo, Ilonga, Mapoli, Mbumba, Neema, Tungaluna, Itoka, and Bogaert, 2021, Tropicultura, 39 (1: 1709): 1–19, discussed habitat preference in Tshopo and Ituri, northern Dem. Rep. Congo. Badjedjea, Masudi, Akaibe, and Gvoždík, 2022, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 16 (1: e301): 49–51, commented on a population from the Kokolopori Bonobo Nature Reserve, Tshuapa Province, Dem. Rep. Congo. Dehling and Sinsch, 2023, Diversity, 15 (512): 66, specifically excluded this species from Rwanda.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.