- Amphibian Species of the World on social media
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- Running log of additions and changes, 2023
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2022
- How to cite
- How to use
- History of the project, 1980 to 2023
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2023)
- Scientific Nomenclature and Its Discontents
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Contributors, online editions
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Afrixalus vittiger (Peters, 1876)
Hyperolius vittiger Peters, 1876, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1876: 122. Holotype: ZMB 8669, by original designation. Type locality: "Liberia".
Megalixalus vittiger — Boulenger, 1911, Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Genova, Ser. 3, 5: 169.
Afrixalus vittiger — Perret, 1976, Bull. Soc. Neuchatel. Sci. Nat., 99: 22; Pickersgill, 2007, Afr. J. Herpetol., 56: 23.
English Names
Savannah Banana Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 66).
Spiny Reed Frog (Emms, Jambang, Bah, Mankali, Rödel, and Barnett, 2005, Herpetol. Bull., London, 94: 13).
Pyjama Spiny Reed Frog ( Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 154).
Distribution
West African savannas from Gambia and Senegal through southern Mali and Burkina Faso to the coast and east to western Nigeria and provisionally to northern Cameroon (see comment).
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Benin, Burkina Faso, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo
Comment
Afrixalus vittger Peters, 1876, had been placed in synonym with Afrixalus fulvovittatus by Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 1212, Loveridge, 1929, Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 151, Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 439; and Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 59; recognized as distinct by by Perret, 1976, Bull. Soc. Neuchatel. Sci. Nat., 99: 22, and Rödel, 2000, Herpetofauna W. Afr., 1: 232-238. See comments by Rödel and Bangoura, 2004, Tropical Zool., 17: 214, regarding distinctiveness of Afrixalus vittiger and Afrixalus fulvovittatus in Guinea. Wanger, 2005, Salamandra, 41: 27-33, provided Gambia records, as did Emms, Jambang, Bah, Mankali, Rödel, and Barnett, 2005, Herpetol. Bull., London, 94: 6-16. Segniagbeto, Bowessidjaou, Dubois, and Ohler, 2007, Alytes, 24: 76, commented on the presence of this species in Togo. See comments by Rödel, Gil, Agyei, Leaché, Diaz, Fujita, and Ernst, 2005, Salamandra, 41: 117-118. Pickersgill, 2007, Afr. J. Herpetol., 56: 23-37, discussed and redelimited this species compared with Afrixalus fulvovittatus and relegated a number of names implicitly to Afrixalus "quadrivittatus" which he considered to be a conglomeration of cryptic or poorly understood species. Amiet, 2009, Rev. Suisse Zool., 116: 53-92, reported specimens from northern Cameroon as Afrixalus "vittiger". See account for Cameroon by Amiet, 2012, Rainettes Cameroun: 102-105. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 194, reported on comparative tadpole morphology. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 154–155, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. Portik, Bell, Blackburn, Bauer, Barratt, Branch, Burger, Channing, Colston, Conradie, Dehling, Drewes, Ernst, Greenbaum, Gvoždík, Harvey, Hillers, Hirschfeld, Jongsma, Kielgast, Kouete, Lawson, Leaché, Loader, Lötters, van der Meijden, Menegon, Müller, Nagy, Ofori-Boateng, Ohler, Papenfuss, Rößler, Sinsch, Rödel, Veith, Vindum, Zassi-Boulou, and McGuire, 2019, Syst. Biol., 68: 859–875, suggested that this nominal species is a complex. Ayoro, Segniagbeto, Hema, Penner, Oueda, Dubois, Rödel, Kabré, and Ohler, 2020, Zoosystema, 42: 547–582, discussed records, identification, and habitat in Burkina Faso. Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 438, briefly discussed the holotype and early literature of the species. Nečas, Kielgast, Nagy, Chifundera, and Gvoždík, 2022, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 174 (107514): 1–11, provided a molecular tree that suggests that this nominal species is composed of at least 2 species.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observation see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.