- What is Amphibian Species of the World?
- How to cite
- How to use
- Structure of the taxonomic records
- Running log of additions and changes, 2025
- Logs of changes and additions, 2014–2024
- What is the right name?
- Curator's blog
- History of the project, 1980 to 2024
- Comments on amphibian taxonomy relating to versions 3.0 to 6.2 (2004 to 2024)
- Scientific Nomenclature and its Discontents: Comments by Frost on Rules and Philosophy of Taxonomy, Ranks, and Their Applications
- Contributors, online editions
- Contributors and reviewers for Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (1985)
- Versions
- Museum abbreviations
- Links to useful amphibian systematic, conservation, collection management, informational, and/or regional sites
- Links to useful FREE library sites
- Copyright and terms of use
Hyperolius concolor (Hallowell, 1844)
Ixalus concolor Hallowell, 1844, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 2: 60. Holotype: ANSP 3216, according to Malnate, 1971, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 123: 350. Type locality: "Liberia".
Euchnemis modestus Lichtenstein and Martens, 1856, Nomencl. Rept. Amph. Mus. Zool. Berol.: 36. Nomen nudum. Synonymy by Günther, 1859 "1858", Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus.: 88.
Hyperolius modestus Günther, 1859 "1858", Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus.: 88. Holotype: BMNH, by original designation; now BM 1947.2.25.47 according to museum records. Type localty: "Gold Coast". Synonymy by Peters, 1875, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1875: 207; Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 124.
Hyperolius concolor — Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 342; Peters, 1875, Monatsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 1875: 207; Noble, 1924, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 49: 251.
Hyperolius concolor — Cope, 1862, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 14: 342; Barbour and Loveridge, 1930, in Strong (ed.), Afr. Rep. Liberia Belgian Congo, 2: 783.
Rappia concolor — Boulenger, 1882, Cat. Batr. Sal. Coll. Brit. Mus., Ed. 2: 124; Chabanaud, 1921, Bull. Com. Études Hist. Scient. Afr. Occid. Franç., 1921: 457.
Rappia spurrelli Boulenger, 1917, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 8, 19: 408. Holotype: BMNH, by original designation; this being 1947.2.9.69 (formerly 1917.4.13.27) according to museum records. Type locality: "Obuasi, S. Ashantee". Synonymy with Hyperolius concolor concolor by Laurent, 1951, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 23–50; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411.
Hyperolius spurrelli — Noble, 1924, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 49: 251, 329.
Hyperolius spurrelli Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 270.
Hyperolius depressus Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 61. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication; ZMB 43554 is holotype according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 421. Type locality: "Misahöhe, Togo". Synonymy by Laurent, 1958, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 53: 275; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411. The description in Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 61, appeared subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 421.
Hyperolius togoensis Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 112. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication. ZMB 39009 is the holotype according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 436. Type locality: “Afrika (ohne genauen Fundort)”. Synonymy by Laurent, 1958, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 53: 275; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411.
Hyperolius petersi Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 23. Syntypes: ZMB unnumbered according to the original publication; ZMB 5573 is holotype according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 431. Type locality: "Mombas" = Mombasa, Kenya. Synonymy by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 77; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411.
Hyperolius argentophthalmus Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 83. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication; ZMB 36092, according to Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 78. Type locality: “ohne genauen Fundort” [without specified locality]. Synonymy by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: : 77; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 357, appeared subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 417.
Hyperolius moseri Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 50. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication, but not so far located according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 441. Type locality: "Togo (Misahöhe)". Synonymy (with Hyperolius concolor concolor) by Laurent, 1951, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 30; Laurent, 1951, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 23–50; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411.
Hyperolius narinus Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 109. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication; ZMB 36090, according to Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 78, and Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 429. Type locality: "Togo (Misahöhe". Synonymy, without discussion, by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: : 77; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411; tentative synonymy by Schiøtz, 1967, Spolia Zool. Mus. Haun., 25: 176.
Hyperolius guineensis Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 30. Syntypes: ZMB unnumbered according to the original publication; ZMB 77464 is holotype according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 424. Type locality: "Guinea". Synonymy by Laurent, 1958, Mem. Inst. Franç. Afr. Noire, 53: 275; Perret, 1966, Zool. Jahrb., Jena, Abt. Syst., 93: 411; (tentative synonymy by) Schiøtz, 1967, Spolia Zool. Mus. Haun., 25: 176. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 285, appeared subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 424.
Hyperolius concolor concolor — Laurent, 1951, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 30; Perret, 1962, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 65: 244.
Common Names
Uniform Reed Frog (Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 182).
Hallowell's Sedge Frog (Ananjeva, Borkin, Darevsky, and Orlov, 1988, Dict. Amph. Rept. Five Languages: 72).
Variable Reed Frog (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World: 67).
Distribution
Eastern Sierra Leone through Benin to Burkina Faso, Nigeria, and western Cameroon. See comment.
Geographic Occurrence
Natural Resident: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Togo
Comment
In the Hyperolius concolor superspecies according to Schiøtz, 1975, Treefrogs E. Afr.: 113. Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 104–105, provided a brief account and map. See comment under Hyperolius stenodactylus. Rödel, 2000, Herpetofauna W. Afr., 1: 194–199, provided an account. Gambia record by Barnett, Emms, and Santoni, 2001, Herpetol. Bull., London, 77: 8, was noted as a likely misidentification by Emms, Jambang, Bah, Mankali, Rödel, and Barnett, 2005, Herpetol. Bull., London, 94: 6–16. Segniagbeto, Bowessidjaou, Dubois, and Ohler, 2007, Alytes, 24: 77, commented on the presence of this species in Togo. Rödel, Brede, Schiefenhövel, Penner, Sinsin, and Nago, 2007, Salamandra, 43: 238, provided a record from Lama Forest, southern Benin. See account for Cameroon by Amiet, 2012, Rainettes Cameroun: 262–270. Channing, Rödel, and Channing, 2012, Tadpoles of Africa: 209, reported on comparative tadpole morphology. : xxx, regarded this species as present in Angola, although Marques, Ceríaco, Blackburn, and Bauer, 2018, Proc. California Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, 65 (Suppl. II): 101–102, suggested these were likely based on misidentifications. Rödel and Glos, 2019, Zoosyst. Evol., 95: 21, reported this species from the Krahn-Bassa Proposed Protected Area in southeastern Liberia and the Foya Proposed Protected Area in western Liberia. Dehling and Sinsch, 2019, Zool. Anz., 280: 65–77, placed this species in their Hyperolius cinnamomeoventris group. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 182–183, provided a brief account, photograph, and range map. See Hyperolius stenodactylus, which may be a synonym. Ayoro, Segniagbeto, Hema, Penner, Oueda, Dubois, Rödel, Kabré, and Ohler, 2020, Zoosystema, 42: 547–582, discussed records, identification, and habitat in Burkina Faso. Kanga, Kouamé, Zogbass, Gongomin, Agoh, Kouamé, Konan, Adepo-Gourène, Gourène, and Rödel, 2021, Amph. Rept. Conserv., 15: 71–107, commented on conservation status, identification, range, and habitat on the Ivory Coast side of Mont Nimba. Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 407–450, discussed the types, their provenance, and literature of Hyperolius argentophthalmus, Hyperolius depressus, Hyperolius guineensis, Hyperolius guttatus, Hyperolius hildebrandti, Hyperolius maximus, Hyperolius moseri, Hyperolius narinus, Hyperolius petersi, Hyperolius pulcher, and Hyperolius togoensis. Gansa, Agadjihouèdé, and Hounkanrin, 2023, Afr. Zool., 58: 39–56, reported the species from the lower Ouémé Valley, southern Benin, and briefly descried habitat preference. Segniagbeto, Ohler, Rödel, Luiselli, and Dubois, 2024, Zoosystema, 46: 644–645, provided an account for Togo, discussing habitat, distribution, conservation status, and identification. Leaché, Oaks, Ofori-Boateng, and Fujita, 2024, Evolution, 74: 716–724, discussed comparative phylogeography across the Dahomey Gap in Ghana.
External links:
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
- For access to general information see Wikipedia
- For additional sources of general information from other websites search Google
- For access to relevant technical literature search Google Scholar
- For images search CalPhoto Images and Google Images
- To search the NIH genetic sequence database, see GenBank
- For additional information see AmphibiaWeb report
- For information on conservation status and distribution see the IUCN Redlist
- For information on distribution, habitat, and conservation see the Map of Life
- For related information on conservation and images as well as observations see iNaturalist
- For access to available specimen data for this species, from over 350 scientific collections, go to Vertnet.