Hyperolius mariae Barbour and Loveridge, 1928

Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Hyperoliidae > Subfamily: Hyperoliinae > Genus: Hyperolius > Species: Hyperolius mariae

Hyperolius mariae Barbour and Loveridge, 1928, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., 50: 217. Holotype: MCZ 13267, by original designation. Type locality: "near the mill dam at Derema, Usambara Mtns., Tanganyika Territory [= Tanzania]".

Hyperolius bitaeniatus Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 58. Holotype: ZMB 39004, according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 418. Type locality: “Konde-Nika, Deutsch-Ost-Afrika” [= Region at the northern tip of Lake Malawi, Mbeya and Njombe Region, Tanzania]. Synonymy by Schiøtz, 1975, Treefrogs E. Afr.: 211 (as a subspecies of Hyperolius viridiflavus) and by Poynton and Broadley, 1987, Ann. Natal Mus., 28: 224. (as a subspecies of Hyperolius marmoratus). Formerly placed provisionally in synonymy of Hyperolius rhodoscelis by Laurent, 1943, Ann. Mus. R. Congo Belge, Tervuren, Zool., 4: 67. Considered a junior synonym of Hyperolius marmoratus mariae by Laurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 386.

Hyperolius noblei Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 118. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered, according to the original publication; ZMB 85765 is the holotype according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 430. Type locality: "Kilwa (Deutsch-Ostafrika)" = Kilwa (Kivinje), Kilwa District, Lindi Region, Tanzania. Synonymy (with Hyperolius puncticulatus) by Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 372. Considered a junior synonym of Hyperolius marmoratus mariae by Laurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 386. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 400, was published subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 430. 

Hyperolius melanophthalmus  Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 68. Syntypes: ZMB (4 specimens) unnumbered, according to the original publication, these including ZMB 85670–72 (3 specimens) according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 427; including MCZ 17640 (on exchange from ZMB), according to Barbour and Loveridge, 1946, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 96: 128, is a syntype. Type locality: "Sansibar" (= Zanzibar), Tanzania. Synonymy with Hyperolius mariae by Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 372; Parker, Moreau, and Pakenham, 1940, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 11, 5: 309-314. Junior synonym of Hyperolius marmoratus mariae according to Laurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 386. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 341, was published subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 427. 

Hyperolius renschi  Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 115. Holotype: ZMB unnumbered; now lost according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 427. Type locality: "Zansibar", Tanzania. Synonymy with Hyperolius mariae by Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 372; Parker, Moreau, and Pakenham, 1940, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 11, 5: 309-314. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 397, appeared subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 427. 

Hyperolius udjidjiensis Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 97 Holotype: ZMB 36101 according to Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 87. Type locality: "Udjidji" (= Ujiji), Kigoma Province, Tanzania. Synonymy with Hyperolius striolatus by Loveridge, 1933, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 74: 346, although this was ambiguous as he noted that the "Ujiji specimen may be distinct", suggesting that he was only allocating Kenya specimens to Hyperolius striolatus. Synonymy with Hyperolius marmoratus striolatus by Laurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 387. Synonymy with Hyperolius marmoratus rubripes by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 87. The description in Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 370, appeared subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 436.

Hyperolius rubripes Ahl, 1931, Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin, 17: 88. Syntypes: ZMB (2 specimens) unnumbered, according to the original publication, these being ZMB 36110 and 57530 according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 434; ZMB 36110 in error considered holotype by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 87. Type locality: "Kililana", Kenya. Placed in the synonymy of Hyperolius sansibaricus by Loveridge, 1936, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 79: 372. Considered a subspecies of Hyperolius marmoratus by Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 87. The description in  Ahl, 1931, Das Tierreich, 55: 361, subsequently according to Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 430. Synonymy by Wieczorek, Drewes, and Channing, 2001, Amphibia-Reptilia, 22: 159.

Hyperolius marmoratus mariaeLaurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 386.

Hyperolius marmoratus rubripes — Laurent, 1961, Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr., 64: 87.

Hyperolius viridiflavus rubripesSchiøtz, 1975, Treefrogs E. Afr.: 205.

Hyperolius viridiflavus bitaeniatusSchiøtz, 1975, Treefrogs E. Afr.: 211.

Hyperolius marmoratus bitaeniatus —  Poynton and Broadley, 1987, Ann. Natal Mus., 28: 224.

English Names

None noted.

Distribution

Coast of southern Kenya and northeastern Tanzania; northwestern Zambia and adjacent Dem. Rep. Congo.

Comment

Removed from the synonymy of Hyperolius marmoratus by Wieczorek, Drewes, and Channing, 2000, J. Biogeograph., 27: 1235, where it had been placed by Laurent, 1952 "1951", Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 82: 386. Channing and Howell, 2006, Amph. E. Afr.: 168-169, provided an account, but did not include Dem. Rep. Congo or Zambia within the stated range. Pickersgill, 2007, Frog Search: 427, discussed the intergradation of nominal Hyperolius renschi and Hyperolius mariae. See general discussion of the Hyperolius viridiflavus–parallelus–marginatus group by Schiøtz, 1999, Treefrogs Afr.: 206–228, and specifically tof the forms he treats as Rubripes, Mariae, and Bitaeniatus. Harper, Measey, Patrick, Menegon, and Vonesh, 2010, Field Guide Amph. E. Arc Mts. Tanzania and Kenya: 184–185, provided a brief account. Channing and Rödel, 2019, Field Guide Frogs & Other Amph. Afr.: 396, regarded this nominal taxon as too insufficiently known to treat adequately in their field guide. Tillack, de Ruiter, and Rödel, 2021, Zoosyst. Evol., Berlin, 97: 407–450, discussed briefly the types, their collectors and collections, and early literature of Hyperolius bitaeniatus, Hyperolius melanophthalmus, Hyperolius noblei, Hyperolius renschi, Hyperolius rubriceps, and Hyperolius udjidjiensis

External links:

Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.